Re: [apps-discuss] RFC5451bis processing
"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Mon, 01 April 2013 00:26 UTC
Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 43B7F21F85CE for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Sun, 31 Mar 2013 17:26:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.300,
BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ljr0lLUeU+66 for
<apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 31 Mar 2013 17:25:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x22a.google.com (mail-wg0-x22a.google.com
[IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id
C906B21F858B for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>;
Sun, 31 Mar 2013 17:25:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id k13so1742674wgh.3 for
<apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 31 Mar 2013 17:25:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
bh=vtrx/zChJWWCs4Y1Spv49lkQtMxcgTmwhB+BhGYgl1s=;
b=zcoWxMxfZ8MKtfWnxXb3rs6dP57Od3YUMxrBexwAIRV9QjZCIzqTbvhERk1ceruZBs
ZWhX7CPkUCF0c8U/liBPtUXjfXYkr4AaKK0O+cp8UrNJxAlk78qvnSKf29n+Op5thgQN
SjSXiwUAbHWkJRebe708n37mI5/V4BIPmb8Z4oky7BwVj1U2Kdtm3j6nFU9POCHiZoUN
FaOkbmfKE8HXizQQvu2YJgc4iG0dlMpvB1t8NSp2vj0FgPOZRFTxPspU2icCrraCY6aq
5EaZXLeBk8UleAVL5JY1o64oRiSamuEOHJwONKdOWFo4iw3oaeXreZQSaDMMYaADAxFa Afcg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.134.66 with SMTP id pi2mr13097028wjb.51.1364775956987;
Sun, 31 Mar 2013 17:25:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.13.71 with HTTP; Sun, 31 Mar 2013 17:25:56 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20130331232855.87940.qmail@joyce.lan>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20130331154836.0a822628@elandnews.com>
<20130331232855.87940.qmail@joyce.lan>
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2013 17:25:56 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwbOrM2k=cfKx+0BW4K+YZJ-ByAms7dFw2EySB0xM_4W_A@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01228fbe1d482204d941aa22
Cc: SM <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] RFC5451bis processing
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols
<apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>,
<mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>,
<mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 00:26:00 -0000
I'm happy to process it through APPSAWG, and of course recuse myself from the processing formalities. Are there any objections? -MSK On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 4:28 PM, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote: > >Can RFC 5451bis be processed through appsawg? I'll volunteer to > >shepherd if it helps. > > Seems reasonable to me. It's clearly an apps topic, and quite a few > people who are familiar with the A-R header it describes seem to be > here. > > _______________________________________________ > apps-discuss mailing list > apps-discuss@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss >
- Re: [apps-discuss] RFC5451bis processing S Moonesamy
- Re: [apps-discuss] RFC5451bis processing John Levine
- Re: [apps-discuss] RFC5451bis processing Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [apps-discuss] RFC5451bis processing Dave Cridland