IETF Logo Mail Archive

[apps-discuss] Webfinger

"Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com> Mon, 24 October 2011 20:09 UTC

Return-Path: <paulej@packetizer.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50F1E11E8080 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 13:09:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xU-o-egVGACn for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 13:09:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dublin.packetizer.com (dublin.packetizer.com [75.101.130.125]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7A5B11E80C4 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 13:09:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sydney (rrcs-98-101-150-160.midsouth.biz.rr.com [98.101.150.160]) (authenticated bits=0) by dublin.packetizer.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p9OK9rbG012651 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 24 Oct 2011 16:09:54 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=packetizer.com; s=dublin; t=1319486994; bh=lYZI1+YFQKOLYAhF+3PrGYHWJzNgldBFixTvcw1t1uk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=R5HlxfdJ2p3x0mHOfYukayt/+n/LHjIhAFqZkInD9nDskGCLgCR192/q37cv1XgM0 xu/f9fXoFKH1zZHznEIX5yfrwJK1UjtqAYcQ5nDjZsKetMuXfS1gwnQ/ZbdvwcZSPS 7GQt/a56RQAlCXGYeF4YLm4nP+YeozvDkWYXyl7w=
From: "Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com>
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 16:09:50 -0400
Message-ID: <032101cc9288$e3a06910$aae13b30$@packetizer.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0322_01CC9267.5C8EC910"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Content-language: en-us
Thread-index: AcySiOHWZHrUUWZ0SIe1B4nUS477zw==
Cc: Joseph Smarr <jsmarr@google.com>, Gonzalo Salgueiro <gsalguei@cisco.com>
Subject: [apps-discuss] Webfinger
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 20:09:58 -0000

Folks,

 

We just submitted this:

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-jones-appsawg-webfinger-00.txt

 

The tools for Webfinger are now defined, but the procedures need to be
clearer with respect to what most of us understand as "webfinger".  This is
just a first stab at making that happen and we hope to progress this to
publish an RFC in the application area.

 

We welcome any comments you have on the topic, either privately or publicly.

 

Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email