Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-00.txt

Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com> Sat, 17 September 2011 16:55 UTC

Return-Path: <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AFA221F8678 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Sep 2011 09:55:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.474
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.474 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.125, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HMrbY08LO3LZ for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Sep 2011 09:55:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com (mauve.mrochek.com [66.59.230.40]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 083BA21F8669 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Sep 2011 09:55:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dkim-sign.mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01O65M4OP134014D3W@mauve.mrochek.com> for apps-discuss@ietf.org; Sat, 17 Sep 2011 09:56:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01O635JCX1I800RCTX@mauve.mrochek.com>; Sat, 17 Sep 2011 09:56:24 -0700 (PDT)
Message-id: <01O65M4N7X5O00RCTX@mauve.mrochek.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 09:56:14 -0700
From: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
In-reply-to: "Your message dated Sat, 17 Sep 2011 18:52:14 +0300" <4E74C22E.1040208@gmail.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; Format="flowed"
References: <20110830041853.24036.37.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F13512DF99D@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com> <C0FA01F1-E62B-41E1-9093-73E536AB666D@network-heretics.com> <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F13512DFC44@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com> <83FC8B77-CD70-4A25-B639-86879F645DDB@network-heretics.com> <CAC4RtVBU-pszsVpKH0uFrynPtoZC4_-RoGcOT5XTeugEtRp7zg@mail.gmail.com> <4E74C13D.7080908@isode.com> <4E74C22E.1040208@gmail.com>
To: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=mrochek.com; s=mauve; t=1316278667; bh=pk35TgI4Bwv6E8Wg1EH6zSgKjCwshB+4RD76zOFiO1Q=; h=Cc:Message-id:Date:From:Subject:In-reply-to:MIME-version: Content-type:References:To; b=O+9Ebby7AidUwEtDRo+4QIGzJKM4JMnE3fQJhGO4//h5NSKgsOmIsjERfamOS8gDS prGgFmonOWBNCcby/iiY1FIPg4KAup4ne8oANjBg9G/mtMawqQhfNBoa1nQNTn8OGO UuhQk9Y3dQw5I+zjzYXQ7qFDG88XTTQrwivNpwH0=
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-00.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 16:55:54 -0000

> 17.09.2011 18:48, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> > 3.  The multipart/report Media Type
> >
> >   1.  [REQUIRED] The first body part contains a human readable message.
> >       The purpose of this message is to provide an easily understood
> >       description of the condition(s) that caused the report to be
> >       generated, for a human reader who may not have a user agent
> >       capable of interpreting the second section of the multipart/
> >       report.  The text in the first section may be in any MIME
> >       standards-track media type, charset, or language.
> >
> > Is "standards-track" really intended here? This seems both overly
> > restrictive
> > and not well specified (where can one find the list of *all*
> > standards-track
> > media type, or more specifically how long it would take one to find
> > them all?).
> > I suggest replacing with "registered" or "registered with IANA".

> As registration guidelines for MIME types are "Expert Review" I also
> don't think such constraint is useful here.

+1

				Ned