Re: [apps-discuss] Updating the status of SPF

[Ned Freed <[e-mail]>]

> On Aug 8, 2011, at 1:02 PM, Barry Leiba wrote:

> > I believe this absolutely needs its own WG, and the proponents should
> > work on a draft charter.  The charter should be clear that it's aiming
> > to move SPF to Standards Track, that it is specifically NOT addressing
> > Sender-ID, and that any merging of Sender-ID into SPF is out of scope.
> > The charter should have explanatory text about the experiment having
> > been done, the results being clear, and deployment being widespread.
> > The WG wants, it should say, to document the experimental results and
> > shift SPF onto Standards Track.

> +1, particularly regarding documenting the results.

+1. If this needs doing, this is how to do it.

				Ned