IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Webfinger

"Mykyta Yevstifeyev (М. Євстіфеєв)" <evnikita2@gmail.com> Sun, 20 November 2011 05:05 UTC

Return-Path: <evnikita2@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADF291F0C3B for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 21:05:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.315
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.315 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.017, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0uwu8FY-nLvF for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 21:05:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-bw0-f44.google.com (mail-bw0-f44.google.com [209.85.214.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A73AB21F84AA for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 21:05:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by bkbzv15 with SMTP id zv15so5916212bkb.31 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 21:05:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type; bh=27+1YnJ3AnK8lkup0eB5Ty49Bmw0MhpZ3DT6I5dCjUs=; b=euEbF9SPShQHgRU6Yn1izMOxGQ6WakNzvBUO2GsxdGY1HEuvYYeJfg1AgSuuvcDa+p HvAhz78VyF0x/YxthQcW/+9vYDuXhpBoLQ2HrrGdTbz9Uz3YetDxcxjS83z4pqmTVRnS n28KHVnz1Gn1Brx2QIyGqGJsqGtvGCwyRwpjQ=
Received: by 10.204.12.68 with SMTP id w4mr9242140bkw.31.1321765502525; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 21:05:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([195.191.104.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i3sm10998792faf.0.2011.11.19.21.04.59 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 19 Nov 2011 21:05:00 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4EC88AAF.2000007@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 07:05:51 +0200
From: "\"Mykyta Yevstifeyev (М. Євстіфеєв )\"" <evnikita2@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
References: <032101cc9288$e3a06910$aae13b30$@packetizer.com> <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E7234526735EDED@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET>
In-Reply-To: <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E7234526735EDED@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------080202090303050509080304"
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Webfinger
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 05:05:05 -0000

19.11.2011 17:03, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote:
>
> 3.Are there reasons not to mandate HTTPS?
>

I don't think the document should put MUST on using HTTPS.  RFC 6415 
specified that host-meta document can be located using both HTTP and 
HTTPS, and I don't see a reason to constrain this in Webfinger.  Maybe 
the spec. should repeat that both HTTP and secured variants may be used.

Mykyta Yevstifeyev

v2.14.0 | Report a Bug | By Email