IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC for draft-ietf-appsawg-mime-default-charset

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Tue, 10 April 2012 08:25 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FC3F21F8725 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 01:25:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xBYYWkiKAC2F for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 01:25:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 99E8E21F8720 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 01:25:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 10 Apr 2012 08:25:36 -0000
Received: from p57A6FD87.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.178.36]) [87.166.253.135] by mail.gmx.net (mp004) with SMTP; 10 Apr 2012 10:25:36 +0200
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/xxn1NX8jxNgdWHG6r1PbUpLAPP5/FxHENopc01X IZrJ7jibKRtDFi
Message-ID: <4F83EE7F.3070707@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 10:25:35 +0200
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
References: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E0039280C9874@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com> <01OE2UNN2HJ000ZUIL@mauve.mrochek.com> <4F82B5F6.3050806@gmx.de> <01OE3UQGECV600ZUIL@mauve.mrochek.com>
In-Reply-To: <01OE3UQGECV600ZUIL@mauve.mrochek.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC for draft-ietf-appsawg-mime-default-charset
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 08:25:38 -0000

On 2012-04-09 16:28, Ned Freed wrote:
> ...
>> I'm also not totally convinced that HTTPbis actually needs to reference
>> this document at all; any opinions on this?
>
> Really ard to say without knowing how they deal with the iso-8859-1. I
> can see
> it being done in a way that doesn't need a reference. Or it could be
> done in a
> way where a reference would be helpful.

HTTPbis simply has stopped having a custom rule; it just delegates to 
the applicable MIME specs. -> 
<http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/20>

> Not sure I see any need for a normative reference though.
>
> Ned
> ...

Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email