Re: [apps-discuss] a new web security list

Dave CROCKER <dhc@dcrocker.net> Thu, 17 February 2011 22:03 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86C993A6D31 for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 14:03:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.547
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.547 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.052, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B+3etnuVx-Xi for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 14:03:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D45C3A6CE3 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 14:03:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.3] (adsl-67-127-56-68.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net [67.127.56.68]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p1HM43AM007264 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 17 Feb 2011 14:04:08 -0800
Message-ID: <4D5D9B46.40003@dcrocker.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 14:03:50 -0800
From: Dave CROCKER <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
References: <4D5D922A.8000508@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <4D5D922A.8000508@stpeter.im>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Thu, 17 Feb 2011 14:04:08 -0800 (PST)
Cc: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] a new web security list
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 22:03:37 -0000

On 2/17/2011 1:24 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> Folks, a dedicated list has been established for discussion about
> requirements and potential implementation of JSON to provide security
> services for Web-based applications. You can subscribe here:
>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/woes


It's almost refreshing to see a healthy anticipation of resistance from 
potential participants.

I assume that accounts for the second word in the acronym:

> Web Objection Encryption and Signatures (WOES)


d/
-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net