Re: [apps-discuss] Applicability Statements

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Wed, 11 May 2011 20:44 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F970E084F for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 May 2011 13:44:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SEDlXwUaOGfZ for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 May 2011 13:44:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pv0-f172.google.com (mail-pv0-f172.google.com [74.125.83.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2258E079B for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 May 2011 13:44:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pvh1 with SMTP id 1so553440pvh.31 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 May 2011 13:44:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent :mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=z+sqkveCvBvGNKS3gV63zQZu49E/bqmXvW8iRztEGzU=; b=W5+S0D7U1c3Mfty9FNCFGaDt4d5Ot2Zf2VpRLrkG4qZEtOQFePJhUA8ARfrKrBS2Y+ 1RbAWokdfAY+5bxZqA1Q30Q0iQpjT58lOEKohD1zI1L6SJCOML2sCC5tUgecrvza/HBE EuDf8rAA4Sb1r8gD0wyfn+AFAT/KojeHGJri0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=nN3yoRUPNejkly7GtvzDhmWqZuDB8rciauOXI8iDiCv+0lzmcjCbFqqDcqrTTGeV+y +Irzi1q+0sboNFgoFhC+4hliEvAOWapL8dz+3bJEZHIrP82FjD6uVf2yMIA2KR7DK/W3 24IhcwfJnmLggxPGpVPHG2t0WJ7wuYM9yGeV4=
Received: by 10.68.28.137 with SMTP id b9mr4972260pbh.191.1305146657378; Wed, 11 May 2011 13:44:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [130.216.38.124] (stf-brian.sfac.auckland.ac.nz [130.216.38.124]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l7sm192497pbo.44.2011.05.11.13.44.12 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 11 May 2011 13:44:16 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4DCAF507.5030508@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 08:43:51 +1200
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
References: <4DCAC1CB.3050905@qualcomm.com> <653ADDA5F1A34D89FA899549@PST.JCK.COM> <BANLkTinApNj8P+V6ze2d-AFWMCZbHXyaHA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinApNj8P+V6ze2d-AFWMCZbHXyaHA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com>, John C Klensin <john@jck.com>, Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Applicability Statements
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 20:44:18 -0000

On 2011-05-12 06:04, Barry Leiba wrote:
>> I think this is entirely sensible.  I've felt for some time that
>> we have underutilized the AS option.  Sometimes we incorporate
>> AS elements into a TS, but it has been a long time since they
>> have been done standalone.  You didn't mention it explicitly,
>> but use of AS documents eliminates another issue that has
>> annoyed lots of people about some BCPs: An AS is entirely
>> appropriate for recommendations about what we think is the least
>> bad thing to do under some set of circumstances.  When we make
>> that sort of recommendation in a BCP, we expose ourselves to the
>> criticism that the recommendation is neither best (as distinct
>> from a bad compromise), nor current (as distinct from a
>> recommendation about future behavior), nor actively practiced.
> 
> This is exactly what I'd have said if John hadn't said it.  Or, put
> another way, "I support the publi...."  No, wait.  Um.
> 
> Yes, let's go ahead with it.

+1. I would recommend it to all Areas in fact, but it's good for
somebody to start.

   Brian