Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-http-problem-01.txt> (Problem Details for HTTP APIs) to Proposed Standard

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de> Wed, 25 November 2015 10:09 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47F841A1A34; Wed, 25 Nov 2015 02:09:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.236
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.236 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.585, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zYWQNS7RW7iW; Wed, 25 Nov 2015 02:09:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.greenbytes.de (mail.greenbytes.de [217.91.35.233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEF601A1A10; Wed, 25 Nov 2015 02:09:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.158] (unknown [217.91.35.233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.greenbytes.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 66FE215A04B2; Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:09:27 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=greenbytes.de; s=mail; t=1448446167; bh=yLHQwgjl6NXtobGxt+fJCXqeQMh+Iz7bdpfVFqIBnk4=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=R69ADN1YNUkb63yz9FOJHN5R9nuUhuCGbt9KO1t/90OXzVrUC3B8nhOcVpMHNfTQC I+Y6ppLrLK+E+8QAKv3h2d9E24NlXX70N0YSOC2zTuvTt6oiDjsDKWxNb3ZsPqc3LC CeAsA2w8eY6w01nfCyi+6DYyGCMayhVRSDm50vG4=
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <20151120205655.17511.99851.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
Message-ID: <565588D8.50402@greenbytes.de>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:09:28 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20151120205655.17511.99851.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/JZmXqKccpNXXiFpSDbzS7aI1aRw>
Cc: appsawg-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-appsawg-http-problem@ietf.org, apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-http-problem-01.txt> (Problem Details for HTTP APIs) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 10:09:37 -0000

On 2015-11-20 21:56, The IESG wrote:
>
> The IESG has received a request from the ART Area General Applications
> Working Group WG (appsawg) to consider the following document:
> - 'Problem Details for HTTP APIs'
>    <draft-ietf-appsawg-http-problem-01.txt> as Proposed Standard
>
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2015-12-04. Exceptionally, comments may be
> sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
>
> Abstract
>
>
>     This document defines a "problem detail" as a way to carry machine-
>     readable details of errors in a HTTP response, to avoid the need to
>     invent new error response formats for HTTP APIs.
>
> Note to Readers
>
>     This draft should be discussed on the apps-discuss mailing list [1].
> ...


I don't believe that all of my WGLC feedback from December 2014 has been 
addressed (and that includes subjects on where we agreed on changes). 
See 
<http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/current/msg13453.html>.

Best regards, Julian