IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Processing draft-bosch-sieve-duplicate via APPSAWG

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Tue, 07 May 2013 22:28 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48B8B21F8F28 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 May 2013 15:28:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.306
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.306 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.293, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h3KhGlAMRUCA for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 May 2013 15:28:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B02711E80A3 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 May 2013 15:28:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ergon.local (unknown [71.237.13.154]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 58E91E8275; Tue, 7 May 2013 16:40:09 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <51898010.7030801@stpeter.im>
Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 16:28:32 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
References: <CAL0qLwb26e4QCaN9SJC3QSUK9M89mkxXY4r7sDyS6KtMMGXXhw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwb26e4QCaN9SJC3QSUK9M89mkxXY4r7sDyS6KtMMGXXhw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Processing draft-bosch-sieve-duplicate via APPSAWG
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 22:28:38 -0000

On 5/7/13 4:24 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> We have received a request to process the above draft through APPSAWG,
> since there is no longer a sieve WG.  It is a relatively short document
> and appears to fall within our charter.
> 
> We haven't processed a sieve extension here yet; rather, they've gone
> through small, tight WGs so far.  Before issuing a formal call for
> adoption, I'd like to gauge whether we have enough sieve-aware people
> currently following APPSAWG to be able to contribute reviews and
> constructive commentary.  A virtual show of hands, please?

Seems reasonable as an APPSAWG item. I'm not a SIEVE expert, but I've
worked on it a bit (RFC 5437) and I would be willing to review this
document.

Peter

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email