Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-shelby-exi-registration-01.txt

Carine Bournez <carine@w3.org> Sat, 14 April 2012 12:10 UTC

Return-Path: <carine@jay.w3.org>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77B4B21F862B for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 05:10:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.100, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id otVaQBVqqKI8 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 05:10:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jay.w3.org (ssh.w3.org [128.30.52.60]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF01021F8625 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 05:10:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from carine by jay.w3.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <carine@jay.w3.org>) id 1SJ1oO-0001X5-Rd; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 08:10:40 -0400
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 08:10:40 -0400
From: Carine Bournez <carine@w3.org>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <20120414121040.GF696@jay.w3.org>
References: <4F88546D.5020007@gmx.de> <f5behrrtwqc.fsf@calexico.inf.ed.ac.uk> <4F885889.5020401@gmx.de> <f5baa2ftvfy.fsf@calexico.inf.ed.ac.uk> <4F886487.3050806@gmx.de> <f5b62d3tsg2.fsf@calexico.inf.ed.ac.uk> <4F886D9B.9030203@gmx.de> <4F886F67.5090005@gmx.de> <20120413200214.GE696@jay.w3.org> <4F88899D.3090405@gmx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4F88899D.3090405@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Cc: "apps-discuss@ietf.org Discuss" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-shelby-exi-registration-01.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 12:10:44 -0000

On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 10:16:29PM +0200, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2012-04-13 22:02, Carine Bournez wrote:
>> ...
>> I suppose that the registration for application/senml+xml could
>> mandate use of a particular schema when encoded with EXI and exclude
>> any additional schema (i.e. no schemaId allowed).
>> ...
>
> Nope. Content-Encoding and media type are orthogonal things.

It was the case until the pack200 content encoding was registered.
EXI has not set any precedent here.