Re: [apps-discuss] DMARC working group charter proposal

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Tue, 02 April 2013 01:56 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E822521F8EC8 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 18:56:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VmzPHTfdVvAK for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 18:56:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E05B821F8EBE for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 18:56:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.3] (unknown [71.237.13.154]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3CA2D40D3A; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 20:06:02 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <515A3AC6.8020504@stpeter.im>
Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 19:56:22 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Scott Kitterman <scott@kitterman.com>
References: <CAL0qLwYc757fw_VhPMHDrgcCimNFak02brDRLAVTq+NR4w34pA@mail.gmail.com> <515A2858.2000907@stpeter.im> <515A35EE.4010503@dcrocker.net> <1981405.krhrID7K1t@scott-latitude-e6320>
In-Reply-To: <1981405.krhrID7K1t@scott-latitude-e6320>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] DMARC working group charter proposal
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2013 01:56:24 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 4/1/13 7:52 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:

> If the installed base cares about backward compatibility, then they
> should show up for the working group.

A big +1 to that. It's not a cure-all, but it sure helps to keep a
working group from going astray.

Peter

- -- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=YREL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----