Re: [apps-discuss] draft-kucherawy-rfc5451bis

["Murray S. Kucherawy" <[e-mail]>]

Reviewers might find this diff from RFC5451 to the current version to be
helpful:

http://www.blackops.org/~msk/draft-kucherawy-rfc5451bis-from-rfc5451.diff.html

-MSK


On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy <[e-mail]>wrote:

> I've uploaded an update to draft-kucherawy-rfc5451bis for review.  It
> incorporates the feedback I've received over the last few months since the
> last version.
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kucherawy-rfc5451bis/
>
> To recap: RFC5451 defines a standard message header field for recording
> the results of things like DKIM and SPF by border MTAs so internal things
> like MUAs don't have to repeat those checks.  This is an update draft based
> on operational experience since the proposed standard was originally
> published in 2009.
>
> So, two things:
>
> 1) Reviewers, please!  I think this is pretty much ready to go as it's
> been around since last June with some reviews, but nothing lately.  A final
> glance by some of the apps community (especially mail people) would be
> grand.
>
> 2) I'd like to process this through APPSAWG.  Salvatore would have to
> shepherd it since I can't shepherd my own document.  Is that a reasonable
> path for this work?  There isn't an active working group doing SMTP things,
> and we know our ADs would prefer to avoid sponsoring things if possible.
>
> Thanks,
> -MSK, participatorially
>
>