Re: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2617bis-edns0-08

Joseph Yee <jyee@afilias.info> Wed, 29 February 2012 21:33 UTC

Return-Path: <jyee@afilias.info>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29EB821F86A3 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:33:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.265
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.265 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oVujhC+HEx23 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:33:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from outbound.afilias.info (outbound.afilias.info [69.46.124.26]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 636D521F86A0 for <Apps-Discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:33:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ms6.yyz2.afilias-ops.info ([10.50.129.112] helo=smtp.afilias.info) by outbound.afilias.info with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <jyee@afilias.info>) id 1S2r9Z-0007UU-9D for Apps-Discuss@ietf.org; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 21:33:41 +0000
Received: from mail-iy0-f178.google.com ([209.85.210.178]) by smtp.afilias.info with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <jyee@afilias.info>) id 1S2r9Z-00055g-8b for Apps-Discuss@ietf.org; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 21:33:41 +0000
Received: by iakl21 with SMTP id l21so7596739iak.9 for <Apps-Discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:33:41 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jyee@afilias.info designates 10.43.52.74 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.43.52.74;
Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jyee@afilias.info designates 10.43.52.74 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jyee@afilias.info
Received: from mr.google.com ([10.43.52.74]) by 10.43.52.74 with SMTP id vl10mr1704591icb.55.1330551221344 (num_hops = 1); Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:33:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.43.52.74 with SMTP id vl10mr1401069icb.55.1330551221287; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:33:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.103] (69-196-170-240.dsl.teksavvy.com. [69.196.170.240]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bi6sm15877353igc.3.2012.02.29.13.33.40 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:33:40 -0800 (PST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Joseph Yee <jyee@afilias.info>
In-Reply-To: <CF763D24-B8DF-43F2-BE38-C26EC9B47605@afilias.info>
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 16:33:19 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <26FB6366-DA4F-43F1-AA7E-5E4F67ED8311@afilias.info>
References: <CF763D24-B8DF-43F2-BE38-C26EC9B47605@afilias.info>
To: Apps-Discuss@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2617bis-edns0.all@tools.ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmwuSV41EJetl9hbZS74Rxw6malBlKrtFfFdx8dWoVWOTsweXex/AXiuxCTVCYhxWQ08gRW
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2617bis-edns0-08
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 21:33:43 -0000

forgot to remove version number in the email
-Joseph

On 2012-02-29, at 4:30 PM, Joseph Yee wrote:

> 
> I have been selected as the Applications Area Directorate reviewer for this draft (for background on appsdir, please see  http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/ApplicationsAreaDirectorate)
> 
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
> 
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2671bis-edns0-08
> Title: Extension Mechanisms for DNS (EDNS0)
> Reviewer: Joseph Yee
> Review Date: Feb 29, 2012
> 
> 
> Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as a Proposed Standard Standard RFC but has a few issues that should be fixed before publication
> 
> Major Issues: 
> 	none
> 
> Minor Issues: 
> 	(1) 
> 	Although no negative impact from the lack of mention in the draft, Binary Label in IANA should change its status to obsolete (or historic or just remove the entry?).  
> 
> 	(2) 
> 	The paragraph in section 10 (8th paragraph from page 13) is hard to read.  I'm debated whether to put this into minor or nits.  I don't see negative impact keeping it as is, but recommend to improve it if possible.
> 
> Nits: 
> 	(1)
> 	typo at section 10, 6th paragraph (or 3rd paragraph from page 13)
> 	original
> 	"IANA is advised to udpates reference...."
> 	s/udpates/updates/
> 
>