Re: [apps-discuss] NEW RELATION: property and context
Ioseb Dzmanashvili <ioseb.dzmanashvili@gmail.com> Sun, 26 May 2013 11:51 UTC
Return-Path: <ioseb.dzmanashvili@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1D5121F9003; Sun, 26 May 2013 04:51:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.600, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_102=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_52=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mYU7OHI1Xbnu; Sun, 26 May 2013 04:51:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x229.google.com (mail-wg0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83B0A21F9017; Sun, 26 May 2013 04:51:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id k13so1476769wgh.2 for <multiple recipients>; Sun, 26 May 2013 04:51:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; bh=SUSWvmG777bylWLCgbWiXKIVDHpz5fI3fa+1PPHch2c=; b=KaTCQfSA6E8ELHxiBlgjPw1G4S46OKoCvPeuMPvFN7eUBxOFhDX0xhdukUp8eR8wxw 2vbNuHD7QZDEoKi0RTzWQs8l5bQNXLBIBrH9o7XQnM3Lq5BnmWjrM1oZQiydqmb8KEn2 6NiKpDoC15/T16Tji2AWL592VvYRGkf7aOIQsXlscfl22v6R8+i8uGTfTGud3BdxFmFp wTzya961qv6rqSv3+HAvLIF7388aSkTghnS4+6wWuO7WhmWOObqhZXhPTGsBu7TVWjXB kbiySVfFmqaUYTxX0MvjmKXP3sAWfYduvHnNZdCx4aBxIfWJgEpmrVxePjNqlrHxw6mL 96NQ==
X-Received: by 10.194.216.39 with SMTP id on7mr5367429wjc.4.1369569077676; Sun, 26 May 2013 04:51:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.7] ([176.73.174.236]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id f1sm6661949eem.17.2013.05.26.04.51.15 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 26 May 2013 04:51:16 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 15:51:14 +0400
From: Ioseb Dzmanashvili <ioseb.dzmanashvili@gmail.com>
To: mca <mca@amundsen.com>
Message-ID: <87B38357AED34BF89465EC5111A090EA@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPW_8m6zG17d7CJhJAZBZWNTkVOnP7Am1EfT0t93pCM-y7Wodw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4038B5FE76874C54A819A07FE192AEF8@gmail.com> <CAPW_8m6zG17d7CJhJAZBZWNTkVOnP7Am1EfT0t93pCM-y7Wodw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: sparrow 1.6.4 (build 1178)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="51a1f732_22221a70_1b1"
Cc: IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>, "link-relations@ietf.org" <link-relations@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] NEW RELATION: property and context
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 11:51:21 -0000
Hi Mike, Thanks for response! > How are these different from the "collection" and "item" link relations? > IOW, what can be described by "property" and "context" that cannot be described by "collection" and "item"? It depends how we look at things. For example if if we've a resource that is a photo(or video etc...) we can not describe it as a collection. If we've resource which is a property of that photo we can indicate the context resource of this photo with the "context" link relation, as i understand and see it the "collection" link relation doesn't properly describe photo which definitely is not a collection of items itself. Another example is a file which has various attributes(or properties), if for example i want to express these properties of the file as links i think the "property" link relation will be more correct rather than the "item" link relation IMHO. ioseb On Sunday, May 26, 2013 at 3:38 PM, mca wrote: > How are these different from the "collection" and "item" link relations? > IOW, what can be described by "property" and "context" that cannot be described by "collection" and "item"? > On May 26, 2013 1:22 PM, "Ioseb Dzmanashvili" <ioseb.dzmanashvili@gmail.com (mailto:ioseb.dzmanashvili@gmail.com)> wrote: > > Dear All, > > > > I've submitted new draft for the "property" and "context" link relation types: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-property-and-context-link-relations-00 > > > > Description: > > > > - This specification defines link relation types that may be used to express the relationships between a resource and associated properties or between a resource and it's context. > > - The "property" and "context" link relations are intentionally generic, and they can be used with multiple media types in a wide variety of use cases > > > > - The "property" Link Relation Type: When included in a response, the "property" link relation identifies a target resource that represents a property of the context resource. > > - The "context" Link Relation Type: When included in a response, the "context" link relation identifies a target resource that represents a context document of which the context resource is a member. > > > > > > Could you please review? > > Thanks in advance! > > > > > > Best regards, > > ioseb > > -- > > Ioseb Dzmanashvili > > AzRy LLC > > Software Architect > > #8, Chachava str. > > Tbilisi, 0159, Georgia > > > > Mobile: +(995) 99753388 > > github.com/ioseb (http://github.com/ioseb) > > twitter.com/iosebi (http://twitter.com/iosebi) > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > apps-discuss mailing list > > apps-discuss@ietf.org (mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org) > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss > >
- Re: [apps-discuss] NEW RELATION: property and con… Ioseb Dzmanashvili
- Re: [apps-discuss] NEW RELATION: property and con… Ioseb Dzmanashvili
- [apps-discuss] NEW RELATION: property and context Ioseb Dzmanashvili
- Re: [apps-discuss] NEW RELATION: property and con… mike amundsen
- Re: [apps-discuss] NEW RELATION: property and con… Ioseb Dzmanashvili
- Re: [apps-discuss] NEW RELATION: property and con… Ioseb Dzmanashvili
- Re: [apps-discuss] NEW RELATION: property and con… Jan Algermissen
- Re: [apps-discuss] NEW RELATION: property and con… mca
- Re: [apps-discuss] NEW RELATION: property and con… Markus Lanthaler
- Re: [apps-discuss] NEW RELATION: property and con… Ioseb Dzmanashvili
- Re: [apps-discuss] NEW RELATION: property and con… Erik Wilde
- Re: [apps-discuss] NEW RELATION: property and con… janalgermissen1und1
- Re: [apps-discuss] NEW RELATION: property and con… Ioseb Dzmanashvili
- Re: [apps-discuss] NEW RELATION: property and con… Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [apps-discuss] NEW RELATION: property and con… Markus Lanthaler
- Re: [apps-discuss] NEW RELATION: property and con… James M Snell
- Re: [apps-discuss] NEW RELATION: property and con… Markus Lanthaler
- Re: [apps-discuss] NEW RELATION: property and con… James M Snell
- Re: [apps-discuss] NEW RELATION: property and con… Markus Lanthaler
- Re: [apps-discuss] NEW RELATION: property and con… Ioseb Dzmanashvili
- Re: [apps-discuss] NEW RELATION: property and con… Markus Lanthaler
- Re: [apps-discuss] NEW RELATION: property and con… Ioseb Dzmanashvili
- Re: [apps-discuss] NEW RELATION: property and con… Markus Lanthaler
- Re: [apps-discuss] NEW RELATION: property and con… Ioseb Dzmanashvili