IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] SenML

Zach Shelby <zach@sensinode.com> Thu, 01 March 2012 13:45 UTC

Return-Path: <zach@sensinode.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9831021F8BEC for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 05:45:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H1ofBCcOzXrw for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 05:45:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from auth-smtp.nebula.fi (auth-smtp.nebula.fi [217.30.180.105]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A5DE21F8BE3 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 05:45:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [213.145.205.237] ([213.145.205.237]) (authenticated bits=0) by auth-smtp.nebula.fi (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id q21DjjFr018140; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 15:45:46 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Zach Shelby <zach@sensinode.com>
In-Reply-To: <1CE2FB42E90B614C98BC172FAB12D4C002D3FCFF8A@DEMCHP99E55MSX.ww902.siemens.net>
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 15:45:45 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <52B10DF8-11D1-44FE-8A8B-184BB0AE12F2@sensinode.com>
References: <1CE2FB42E90B614C98BC172FAB12D4C002D3FCFF8A@DEMCHP99E55MSX.ww902.siemens.net>
To: "Kaebisch, Sebastian" <sebastian.kaebisch.ext@siemens.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] SenML
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 13:45:50 -0000

Hi Sebastian,

Your suggestions for optimizing the XSD for EXI use would be very welcome. Looking forward to it! 

Thanks,
Zach 

On Feb 29, 2012, at 6:26 PM, Kaebisch, Sebastian wrote:

> 
> Hi all, 
> 
> I have some improvement suggestions concerning the XSD which is used for senML EXI coding. Right now, there are some types defined which are not optimal for small embedded devices. E.g., attribute "t", "ut", and "ver" are typed as "integer". I think, "int" will be enough in that context. Furthermore, I would like to suggest to make some changes in the XSD definitions (e.g., using enumerations) to make the EXI message instances more compact. I will prepare an XSD proposal for the next week for further discussions.
> 
> Best regards
> Sebastian Käbisch
> 
> _______________________________________________
> apps-discuss mailing list
> apps-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss

-- 
Zach Shelby, Chief Nerd, Sensinode Ltd.
http://www.sensinode.com
http://zachshelby.org  - My blog "On the Internet of Things"
http://6lowpan.net - My book "6LoWPAN: The Wireless Embedded Internet"
Mobile: +358 40 7796297

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status