IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] "finding registered domains"

Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se> Sun, 10 March 2013 19:03 UTC

Return-Path: <paf@frobbit.se>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E542F11E80DC for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 12:03:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2E-ccQrmwshm for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 12:03:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.frobbit.se (mail.frobbit.se [IPv6:2a02:80:3ffe::176]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A2EB11E80D2 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 12:03:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2a02:80:3ffc::14] (unknown [IPv6:2a02:80:3ffc::14]) by mail.frobbit.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A49D8217C4; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 20:03:18 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
From: Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se>
In-Reply-To: <20130310182928.GE37514@mx1.yitter.info>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 20:03:16 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2EB68C60-4146-4072-A005-DA8DD9AF7993@frobbit.se>
References: <20130310042250.GE33497@mx1.yitter.info> <75239F19-93AF-40EF-A367-0E289A6D1269@frobbit.se> <20130310182928.GE37514@mx1.yitter.info>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] "finding registered domains"
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 19:03:22 -0000

On 10 mar 2013, at 19:29, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:

> A significant point of this proposal is to get this away from trying
> to use the zone cut as in any way meaningful in this context.  It's
> the illusion that a zone cut tells you anything here that we need to
> combat.  That was a category mistake that people made early on.

Yes, I remember that, agree with this try to get out of that trap, but I fell into it :-(

> Moreover, when I initially thought about this, I thought that maybe we
> could link the SOPA record to zone cuts; but I quickly realized that
> the zone cut is really an orthoganal issue, and we shouldn't nail this
> problem to that one.

Sorry for using that term. My fault.

Let me express it differently, "should a cookie (etc) be possible to set for this domain name?"..

   paf

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status