Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-mime-default-charset-03.txt> (Update to MIME regarding Charset Parameter Handling in Textual Media Types) to Proposed Standard

t.petch <ietfc@btconnect.com> Fri, 11 May 2012 14:35 UTC

Return-Path: <ietfc@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3D5021F8638 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 May 2012 07:35:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.578
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.578 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.021, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yWUdCy6g7SXR for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 May 2012 07:35:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from am1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (am1ehsobe006.messaging.microsoft.com [213.199.154.209]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 348EC21F862F for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 May 2012 07:35:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail21-am1-R.bigfish.com (10.3.201.243) by AM1EHSOBE005.bigfish.com (10.3.204.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Fri, 11 May 2012 14:35:14 +0000
Received: from mail21-am1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail21-am1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CFDB100171; Fri, 11 May 2012 14:35:14 +0000 (UTC)
X-SpamScore: -22
X-BigFish: PS-22(zz9371I542Mzz1202hzz1033IL8275bh8275dhz2dh2a8h5a9h668h839hd24h304l)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.55.224.141; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:DB3PRD0702HT001.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
Received: from mail21-am1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail21-am1 (MessageSwitch) id 1336746912941272_812; Fri, 11 May 2012 14:35:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from AM1EHSMHS015.bigfish.com (unknown [10.3.201.254]) by mail21-am1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E12B52E0098; Fri, 11 May 2012 14:35:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from DB3PRD0702HT001.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (157.55.224.141) by AM1EHSMHS015.bigfish.com (10.3.207.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Fri, 11 May 2012 14:35:11 +0000
Received: from BY2PRD0710HT002.namprd07.prod.outlook.com (157.56.236.133) by pod51017.outlook.com (10.3.4.141) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.15.74.2; Fri, 11 May 2012 14:35:01 +0000
Message-ID: <00a801cd2f7a$90e429c0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
From: "t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
References: <20120423132812.32410.11259.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com><CAC4RtVDZfXi1JwGJLGwOVgsGuU-1dH-uj8bXTGCmjrva80mNhg@mail.gmail.com><01OF8RSPPS320006TF@mauve.mrochek.com><CALaySJLFrKSF9JPBC54j0EaTQ6SNXM2+tag2uU2SmVjWxE7Erg@mail.gmail.com> <01OF98WFXDKI0006TF@mauve.mrochek.com>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 14:59:56 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Originating-IP: [157.56.236.133]
X-OriginatorOrg: btconnect.com
Cc: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>, apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-mime-default-charset-03.txt> (Update to MIME regarding Charset Parameter Handling in Textual Media Types) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 14:35:17 -0000

What charset should be used to inspect the content?  Should this be defined in
this I-D?

The new rules say that
"charset" parameter is not used for the defined
       subtype, because the charset information is transported inside
       the payload (such as in "text/xml")

 But a charset is needed in order to read the payload and determine that
charset.  Catch-22?

Tom Petch


----- Original Message -----
From: "Ned Freed" <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
To: "Barry Leiba" <barryleiba@computer.org>
Cc: "Ned Freed" <ned.freed@mrochek.com>; <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 4:33 AM