Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-03.txt
"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Tue, 29 November 2011 23:39 UTC
Return-Path: <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B0941F0C73 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 15:39:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.956
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.956 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.357, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LME6dzUPAkoQ for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 15:39:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ht2-outbound.cloudmark.com (ht2-outbound.cloudmark.com [72.5.239.36]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 312321F0C51 for <discuss@apps.ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 15:39:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.1.74]) by spite.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.10.72]) with mapi; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 15:39:49 -0800
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: Apps-Discusssion <discuss@apps.ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 15:39:49 -0800
Thread-Topic: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-03.txt
Thread-Index: Acyu72mxtCu4WvlFRJeVPMzks0F7VgAAKvaA
Message-ID: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C152BF@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <20111129211229.22583.58326.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <11474880.20111129153402@pobox.com>
In-Reply-To: <11474880.20111129153402@pobox.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-03.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 23:39:50 -0000
> -----Original Message----- > From: apps-discuss-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:apps-discuss-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bill McQuillan > Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 3:34 PM > To: Apps-Discusssion > Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-03.txt > > Looking at the document, I noticed in the second paragraph of the > Introduction a missing word: "overly" what? Ah right, and Stephen Farrell had commented about that in the last round of IESG evaluation as well, and it got away from me. Thanks for the reminder. -04, coming right up.
- [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc… internet-drafts
- Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg… Bill McQuillan
- Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg… Murray S. Kucherawy