Re: [apps-discuss] Documenting UTF-1 as Historic

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Fri, 10 June 2011 15:44 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A640F11E81F8 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 08:44:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.308, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DkU-O-oxYl-z for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 08:44:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 67A7211E8090 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 08:44:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 10 Jun 2011 15:44:21 -0000
Received: from mail.greenbytes.de (EHLO [192.168.1.140]) [217.91.35.233] by mail.gmx.net (mp062) with SMTP; 10 Jun 2011 17:44:21 +0200
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX185+ssheOE5XidUwM39heQJjKijhN5e+EPyBOzZjF gCvbthRzf2tbyk
Message-ID: <4DF23BD4.1080802@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:44:20 +0200
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>
References: <4DF23976.4080301@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4DF23976.4080301@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: Apps-discuss list <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Documenting UTF-1 as Historic
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:44:24 -0000

On 2011-06-10 17:34, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote:
> Hello,
>
> There are a number of RFCs defining transformation formats of ISO
> 10646/Unicode - various UTFs. I mean RFC 3629 (UTF-8), RFC 2152 (UTF-7),
> RFC 2781 (UTF-16) and others. However, I've noticed UTF-1 isn't properly
> documented (or, at least, there is no formal record of it). However,
> since UTF-1 has never been widely used, I suppose it could be formally
> documented in Historic RFC, taking
> http://www.itscj.ipsj.or.jp/ISO-IR/178.pdf as a basis. Any thoughts on
> this?
> ...

Yes. Why do we care?