Re: [apps-discuss] Feeling kind of confused about draft-merrick-jms-uri-12

Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org> Mon, 07 February 2011 10:27 UTC

Return-Path: <GK@ninebynine.org>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B8693A6D93 for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 02:27:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.007
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.007 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, DATE_IN_PAST_12_24=0.992, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gPapodraO9s9 for <apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 02:27:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay1.mail.ox.ac.uk (relay1.mail.ox.ac.uk [129.67.1.165]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68F993A6D91 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 02:27:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp2.mail.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.205]) by relay1.mail.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <GK@ninebynine.org>) id 1PmOJx-00040y-5U; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 10:27:49 +0000
Received: from tinos.zoo.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.24.47]) by smtp2.mail.ox.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <GK@ninebynine.org>) id 1PmOJx-000856-7s; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 10:27:49 +0000
Message-ID: <4D4EC951.4080305@ninebynine.org>
Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2011 16:16:17 +0000
From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Macintosh/20100228)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
References: <AANLkTikaHw7GKiAn1B4Uu5sytyzmi97ExejzfDT82UzO@mail.gmail.com> <4D457248.2080700@isode.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D457248.2080700@isode.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Oxford-Username: zool0635
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Feeling kind of confused about draft-merrick-jms-uri-12
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 10:27:48 -0000

Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> So, your review was treated as one input regarding the document. This 
> document was also reviewed by the Designated Expert for URI 
> registrations (Graham Klyne) and Mark Nottingham (another Apps Review 
> Team review). While they clearly indicated that the document is not 
> ready for PS, I got impression that they thought that the publication as 
> Informational with Provisional URI registration is quite acceptable.

Indeed, I raised concerns similar to some those raised by Tim (though less 
eloquently :), but didn't feel they justified blocking a provisional registration.

Part of what we want to see is sufficient documentation of existing practice 
that it can be understood by others, even if we do not agree with it.

#g
--