Re: [apps-discuss] W3C TAG Comment on Draft Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Fri, 13 April 2012 06:12 UTC

Return-Path: <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7395E21F84B9 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 23:12:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.536
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.536 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.063, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T7r+JuZG9vZ2 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 23:12:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.cloudmark.com (cmgw1.cloudmark.com [208.83.136.25]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E591D21F8474 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 23:12:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com ([72.5.239.26]) by mail.cloudmark.com with bizsmtp id xJC71i0010as01C01JC7cK; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 23:12:20 -0700
X-CMAE-Match: 0
X-CMAE-Score: 0.00
X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=SOLApZTH c=1 sm=1 a=QMZKka45TBd+hNGtXG2bIg==:17 a=_y1Qy5JH2LwA:10 a=4zWJvGiJOd0A:10 a=zutiEJmiVI4A:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=9NGZVl_YAAAA:8 a=9aueKP-jAAAA:8 a=SSmOFEACAAAA:8 a=zQP7CpKOAAAA:8 a=07GO8HKJt7XY8mYe6mIA:9 a=CcNI5IP9WcsjrLIyOGoA:7 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=lZB815dzVvQA:10 a=I9DA3x22SqsA:10 a=jwvSBeqQ3e8A:10 a=69XIa8IdTDMA:10 a=QMZKka45TBd+hNGtXG2bIg==:117
Received: from EXCH-MBX901.corp.cloudmark.com ([fe80::addf:849a:f71c:4a82]) by exch-htcas902.corp.cloudmark.com ([fe80::54de:dc60:5f3e:334%10]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 23:11:52 -0700
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>, Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
Thread-Topic: [apps-discuss] W3C TAG Comment on Draft Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures
Thread-Index: AQHNGSJoMJziXrzkM0OJ32UBsVMLtZaYRUvQ
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 06:11:51 +0000
Message-ID: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E0039280EF063@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <4F877CEE.5030107@arcanedomain.com> <01OE8S1I9Z2K00ZUIL@mauve.mrochek.com>
In-Reply-To: <01OE8S1I9Z2K00ZUIL@mauve.mrochek.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.22.1.150]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cloudmark.com; s=default; t=1334297540; bh=nXhEIYGK+wPPeK1XL5+sl93tMls1a/AhnTV0mVNBv/0=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=mP/dolulCN43pcJnpeBqHjrZfTK/hYd4BPNBf6TvZKHLNJwi9CXdbxcwLGNYOBBOh 4uRuBPeDdVLP47Cacb+KO03NMc+2LKjoa1x1xZLC2ABAb8o4GWEyg+Bk9uzYx6otKq NAc5xslI7+MQURoP9viy5dgl8CPHSFupGUqRRUMw=
Cc: "john+ietf@jck.com" <john+ietf@jck.com>, "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>, "tony+mtsuffix@maillennium.att.com" <tony+mtsuffix@maillennium.att.com>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] W3C TAG Comment on Draft Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 06:12:06 -0000

Hello Noah,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: apps-discuss-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:apps-discuss-
> bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ned Freed
> Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 7:50 PM
> To: Noah Mendelsohn
> Cc: john+ietf@jck.com; ned+ietf@mrochek.com; www-tag@w3.org; apps-discuss@ietf.org; tony+mtsuffix@maillennium.att.com
> Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] W3C TAG Comment on Draft Media Type Specifications and Registration Procedures
> 
> > The W3C Technical Architecture Group have been concerned about
> > conflicting sources of definitions of fragment identifier semantics
> > located by following RFC 3986 and the media type definition. We
> > believe that those defining and registering media types (including
> > ones that follow generic rules such as 3023bis) need more explicit
> > advice than currently contained within draft-ietf-appsawg-media-type-regs.

I'm the document shepherd and responsible working group co-chair for this document.  I concur with Ned on all of his points, perhaps especially that the timing of this kind of input is unfortunate.

Can you provide (hopefully quickly) more specifics about the advice you think is absent from the draft?

-MSK, APPSAWG co-chair