Re: [apps-discuss] feedback on draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-01.txt

["Paul C. Bryan" <[e-mail]>]

Why remove Section 6? Where are fragment identifiers being used in
Appendix A?

Paul 

On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 17:42 +0100, Julian Reschke wrote:

> On 2012-03-20 17:32, Paul C. Bryan wrote:
> > I happen to think JSON Pointer should be the pointer syntax for fragment
> > identifiers used by JSON Patch, not application/json per se. I don't
> > currently see why one would need to amend the JSON specification to
> > support this; any JSON Patch implementation should be fully capable of
> > resolving fragment identifiers itself.
> > ...
> 
> +1 on that, but in that case Section 6 and the examples in appendix A 
> (using pointers in fragment identifiers) should be removed.
> 
> We can't say that we aren't defining the fragment syntax for 
> application/json, but then have examples doing the opposite.
> 
> Best regards, Julian