[apps-discuss] SECOND CALL for IETF 87 (Berlin) agenda items

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Thu, 27 June 2013 00:32 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32D0021F9A2F for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 17:32:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oAMjBcBapeni for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 17:32:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x22b.google.com (mail-wg0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ABA521F9273 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 17:32:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f43.google.com with SMTP id z11so76940wgg.10 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 17:32:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=vd9nUWs+/KmzAwkVN60r7ACCkHr5Gw5Pr4Mx2QeORkc=; b=pme5j2Njuds5H9Zc4qE+3UI2uhvpYa2bZ9S4SrUAn0ICt3ibuOJNN45v1BkWv+i28u Wp7AXi88nC/ypSMckCB5DZKC3G94qv7HHIH14IpOnuyNPiWMW1ERRLI3JD9X2WkHQu5d Rv3Pm5YuFrgQ47RjTTGIJ9AHlnSG4JAnevOtVuijjw4+aFPyIVXu6Rcz73Buc1BhrCpq nA9F1eq+lIeY9RlVUhvkru76S336nNT+ee8BBsgRWn5WLWhZbyGFQj5QqYcCVo0YPWjm 9qgy42t8mEX3J3YPHlKPbn+9orYC25mSMnJng//OHRAI95Fxvb764fzVC4+Zovin7R+M oE7A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.187.209 with SMTP id fu17mr4230481wic.52.1372293149340; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 17:32:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.90.16 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 17:32:28 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 17:32:28 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwY+AbMqyzryFSvAR=bkYP1C1W4XeT7vB1vC0hPAsOYurg@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
To: IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c269acb1ba7504e017e52e"
Subject: [apps-discuss] SECOND CALL for IETF 87 (Berlin) agenda items
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 00:32:31 -0000

On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>wrote:

> Colleagues,
>
> As usual, we will be requesting a Monday morning slot.  This is a call for
> agenda items, or suggestions for same.  Please submit them before June 3rd,
> which is the cutoff date for submitting or amending meeting requests.  We
> will request the usual 2.5 hour session, but we'll shrink it if our agenda
> appears to be thin enough.
>
> You can expect the usual general structure:
>
> - administrivia
> - APPSAWG section
> --- recent activity
> --- current document status and open document issues [*]
> --- incoming/proposed new work [*]
> --- other WG business [*]
> - APPAREA section
> --- new WGs of interest
> --- BoF overview
> --- area-specific topics / AD theatre [*]
> --- presentations [*]
> --- AOB [*]
>
> If you have something you'd like to present in any of the [*] slots above,
> please reply to this post.  If you will be chairing a BoF or a new WG and
> would like to present on that, you are also invited to reply for an agenda
> slot.
>
>
We haven't received a single request for a time slot.  We're beginning to
assemble an agenda now, since we have to post a draft agenda by July 17th.
Also, this meeting in general will be extremely tight time-wise, so if we
don't really need the full 2 1/2 hour time slot, we should determine that
and let the Secretariat know quickly.

Thus, second call: Does anyone wish to present, or request a presentation,
other than the usual administrivia and overview/update items from the
chairs and the ADs?

-MSK, APPSAWG co-chair