[apps-discuss] FW: New Version(-01) for VDI(Virtual Desktop Infrastructure) problem statement document
liang.liang12@zte.com.cn Fri, 01 July 2011 01:01 UTC
Return-Path: <liang.liang12@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35C2621F8814 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 18:01:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.238
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.238 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_37=0.6, RCVD_DOUBLE_IP_LOOSE=0.76, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4bbnBWeViahr for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 18:00:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx5.zte.com.cn (mx6.zte.com.cn [95.130.199.165]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EBDA21F8812 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 18:00:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.30.17.99] by mx5.zte.com.cn with surfront esmtp id 131321193944097; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 08:57:16 +0800 (CST)
Received: from [10.30.3.20] by [192.168.168.15] with StormMail ESMTP id 13796.1193944097; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 09:00:45 +0800 (CST)
Received: from notes_smtp.zte.com.cn ([10.30.1.239]) by mse01.zte.com.cn with ESMTP id p6110fTF024657 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 09:00:41 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from liang.liang12@zte.com.cn)
To: apps-discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-KeepSent: 355208F3:25BF1A93-482578C0:0003CD25; type=4; name=$KeepSent
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.6 March 06, 2007
Message-ID: <OF355208F3.25BF1A93-ON482578C0.0003CD25-482578C0.00058BB5@zte.com.cn>
From: liang.liang12@zte.com.cn
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 09:00:29 +0800
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notes_smtp/zte_ltd(Release 8.5.1FP4|July 25, 2010) at 2011-07-01 09:00:42, Serialize complete at 2011-07-01 09:00:42
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 00058BB4482578C0_="
X-MAIL: mse01.zte.com.cn p6110fTF024657
Subject: [apps-discuss] FW: New Version(-01) for VDI(Virtual Desktop Infrastructure) problem statement document
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 01:01:00 -0000
Dear All, We just published version-01 for VDI problem statement, reworked based on comments from different sources. Thanks a lot for your valuable comments! Following is the detail for version-01 document, pls. help review it and welcome any further comments. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Filename: draft-wang-appsawg-vdi-problem-statement Revision: 01 Title: Virtual Desktop Infrastructure Problem Statement Creation date: 2011-06-30 WG ID: Individual Submission Number of pages: 16 Abstract: The Virtual Desktop Infrastructure is a technology to separate local desktop and remote computing/storage resources, which was initially derived from the remote desktop administration but with new business models and very different use cases. Most of existing VDI systems are based on proprietary implementation, and positioning different market with different features. Since virtual desktop technology is believed to be a mainstream application delivery method, like http protocol against web applications, so it's important to make the virtual desktop access protocol open and standard. This draft summarizes the limitations of existing virtual desktop systems, and proposes the intent standardization work in IETF. URL: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wang-appsawg-vdi-problem-statement/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- In last mail we didn't describe why we submitted our drafts in IETF APPSAWG and it confused many, including our chairman. So I want to say sorry for that. Now I want to explain it briefly: - In current cloud-computing age, more and more "physical computer" will be moved into cloud. For end-user whose computers run in the cloud, people will use some kind of clients to connect to their remote computers. Currently this is adopted by enterprises around the world, and we believe it will be widely adopted by both enterprise and consumer market in near future, just like HTTP we used today. - Currently there are different protocols for communication between user and remote computer, like VNC, SPICE and etc (described in the survey document). And at the same time there will be some trouble if we don't standardize this protocol, which is described in the problem statement document. - VDI protocol runs on top of existing transport and network layer, and it is one application protocol, like HTTP. Because it will re-use many protocols designed in IETF, like TCP/IP, TLS/DTLS and etc, we think IETF is the best place. And IETF APPSAWG focuses on protocols presented in user-oriented programs, so we submit these two documents in APPSAWG. Have a nice day! Thanks, Liang -------------------------------------------------------- ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this mail is solely property of the sender's organization. This mail communication is confidential. Recipients named above are obligated to maintain secrecy and are not permitted to disclose the contents of this communication to others. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the originator of the message. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender. This message has been scanned for viruses and Spam by ZTE Anti-Spam system.
- [apps-discuss] FW: New Version(-01) for VDI(Virtu… liang.liang12