Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-greylisting-05.txt

[Dave Crocker <[e-mail]>]

On 3/14/2012 12:50 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>     7.  An ADMD's own submission service (see [SUBMISSION]) SHOULD NOT
>         apply greylisting checks.  Alternately, an ADMD could simply
>         exempt internal IP addresses from being greylisted, as described
>         in the previous point.
>
> Seems reasonable to me.  Others?


I think the general form of this is:

    7.  Greylisting SHOULD NOT be applied by an ADMD's submission service (see 
[SUBMISSION]) for authenticated client hosts.  Authentication can include 
whatever mechanisms are deemed appropriate for the ADMD, such as known internal 
IP addresses, SASL or the like.



The "alternately" is confusing to me.  Is it meant to apply to non-submission 
services?  If so, then this rule needs something broader, such as:

    7.  Greylisting SHOULD NOT be applied to client hosts internal to the ADMD 
or otherwise part of the ADMD's operation, such as having membership on a list 
of exempt IP Addresses.

d/
-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net