IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-file-scheme-10.txt

Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au> Tue, 31 May 2016 02:45 UTC

Return-Path: <phluid61@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C57D812D128 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 May 2016 19:45:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.45
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.45 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.198, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qb5DmOVfKhR7 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 May 2016 19:45:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x22e.google.com (mail-it0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3381512D13D for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 May 2016 19:45:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id e62so49950879ita.1 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 May 2016 19:45:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc; bh=6pVrDutlvi76RJ/JonqgO11vk5hRVyJQwB6St9wjQBo=; b=s9jyK2/5zaRAbEAmusMd7RJcJhkKnk5918CqFmPOaGCj6lbHYI4wKs4YYCxTwAX2ro TCfEluKeDSOc+TrlUuAM+GyKfRmBiy80Ny/vJuzvgtPt2eTOs/XnCRQunYsnqUhB2n47 dPdodWcyWHqkaxYmQyMlpZh2rQgub1kM3GVzSHUbfRiH1nA0pCOpKLYYirYcSw/SpVJ8 NW2YyLeWFL4AJdrUy2QMN+CE+/GE7jdq2JU29vlpbTxnlZ9gHPrTWeRrwQwyOerOwTc2 tStQ7RwZrUvg3WMEQLVtDHooGaxl2V1BUK9ubMEBHpssckvQtP4ugkC2fOBrBTZtejQF mOfQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=6pVrDutlvi76RJ/JonqgO11vk5hRVyJQwB6St9wjQBo=; b=m2z9FnU/5Un/OqKn5MSVZ/xodMqiFGxT51AKzLc0bU3CTVGKtB/sSfc5RlIApeugiO anj1tqTKM1xjrZ0iLXUGdm1BnDGlu5WTK2Tx9Z+KKmDnerATzy0tUINBQj0pQrYZemfK q0BB/3cZJBbELr2UUDrjtzsUSVoDTPN5j1OYAx9iH3NdD6A0CItZispg+MdvcNHH8RF7 pD7tWE+7LPnaEpPCX0RjGAbo4lqNAqCIgUqtF67SLmz7+AbMW3RkvxEqOTHmDSJoY15h imF7YpPYnmzFEIxSNRzdZIGvJ6dqeFz1M8koZ/Xt/9s6xexqgVaMWUDDDH8doXnBio79 nnuw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tL1APej6FWHY4qFqL6/P61xLpHuvlMWpQfPi8sHJ2a7Bw19e3mE3EqNsJYR3K94d1KFGZb8eZ/rap2SLg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.36.90.73 with SMTP id v70mr10774280ita.10.1464662704528; Mon, 30 May 2016 19:45:04 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: phluid61@gmail.com
Received: by 10.107.138.160 with HTTP; Mon, 30 May 2016 19:45:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CACweHNCV9MErk6zT7-=ALKJVPwe0OpbXW3n8ofBZD0iK5gcC+w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20160531012441.29272.69867.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CACweHNCV9MErk6zT7-=ALKJVPwe0OpbXW3n8ofBZD0iK5gcC+w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 12:45:04 +1000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: PPJ43KlxbYVI9ZpDYPw4Ko44Xz4
Message-ID: <CACweHNCGTvBVKYPQ0_ZCkjW5oxoOAOzLdKRL7p8wtNBkmGUyvg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>
To: IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1143de963825ba05341a5c05"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/NoUTT4rVT0JuVnOUzlXrKP5LTxk>
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-file-scheme-10.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 02:45:07 -0000

On 31 May 2016 at 11:38, Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au> wrote:

>
> Incidentally when updating the references I removed my informative UNC
> syntax, which e
> ​​
> liminated about half a page of appendix and quite a few informative
> references.
>
>
I also sent a bug report to MSDN asking them to fix the mangled ABNF on the
MS-DTYP reference [1]; hopefully that will happen so I won't feel so guilty
relying on it, even as an informative reference.

Cheers

[1]: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg465305.aspx
-- 
  Matthew Kerwin
  http://matthew.kerwin.net.au/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email