IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-00.txt

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Thu, 08 September 2011 16:21 UTC

Return-Path: <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F17021F84A9 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 09:21:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.089, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FQqMKoYywBd9 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 09:21:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com (ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com [72.5.239.35]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDDF221F84A8 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 09:21:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.1.74]) by malice.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.10.71]) with mapi; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 09:23:13 -0700
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>, "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 09:23:12 -0700
Thread-Topic: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-00.txt
Thread-Index: AcxuOYVMxNd3+isySo2iFMw43n4ZKwACfeGw
Message-ID: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F13512DFB31@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <20110830041853.24036.37.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4E68DB1E.6090007@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E68DB1E.6090007@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-00.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 16:21:31 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: apps-discuss-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:apps-discuss-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mykyta Yevstifeyev
> Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2011 8:11 AM
> To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc3462bis-00.txt
> 
> Is the "report-type" parameter values tracked somewhere?  Is there an
> IANA registry for this parameter, or is it going to be created?

The document says: "The report-type parameter ... is the MIME sub-type of the second body part of the multipart/report."  Since MIME types are registered, the report-type value is always a value in that registry, so no new registry is needed.

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status