Re: [apps-discuss] Review of draft-ietf-appsawg-file-scheme

Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au> Wed, 11 May 2016 20:45 UTC

Return-Path: <phluid61@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 253DA12B01E; Wed, 11 May 2016 13:45:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.149
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.149 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.199, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2VNcAxfH5Gen; Wed, 11 May 2016 13:45:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x22e.google.com (mail-io0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 012FC12D5F3; Wed, 11 May 2016 13:45:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id f89so70062296ioi.0; Wed, 11 May 2016 13:45:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc; bh=JzZwEHQ1R0+9Y1vAcf8cWyi7A2QTvFJrHwSqKa2iFew=; b=DN0p8SfsmMFjrM5+XJuGLoIUQAW+Lzt/0E3TzfunZ0kRHi8/736T9jpWg7Tl6DKzrc ZcOgN+VZj4n2dbdUjb9/zDZqzjN9ETyNS1SmfTX3tfzfF3zbDm7WgrjlT5J6l2fyPLod R/mj5Qp1DVLgqoJsEy5SxRtCenAobtiYuia7RAz6GfygYhWGhXJhy8fT6eZbNSbMQlNT l/ucr9CbGWO6rxGNeyxAhnYXTCukEh1gU/jtTttqcTabiKNtBBCg/qmGdnqSwY/1Z9MW I2tW784J+eXpUBf+NACBE5PX3Q27mG9xJ2CoPjGYI9CtJL/t0DYNXuGNpRYJxaREPx5J /Mzg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=JzZwEHQ1R0+9Y1vAcf8cWyi7A2QTvFJrHwSqKa2iFew=; b=Nj3NylCfmuKqTT0Vq5wZZ+secSJeFUVFWpp343439lgY6M7tFKYK9DJv7jjqKVgdbe QtZhr4W9l3J0/K9I3y6fRB+CxcShGzPV3NKsQx/SYnb6hgAf4wHwemhGsGrEQgKF5Hry Qde7V/0qNeKxNIpKfrwelyoeNY0aYJx+dWMXlNleaxtafWJn4tZSgknaTijgTHXccHtB XdXsHqV3xJG+eDR9MO/Zzj+xZ76NSNg5AIFACeLZODvKwMFO17474T9Idym+HDAviMJg 6x1Yp3016hTGhat3X8uV8EXr6lTQrYwECm9Si9STQJDm17E2A2ICjmrElizIab/tclja d5lA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FV6I3791aNd1SjoaWEWXJAEHfa9ieWY8pWdH9VCmT6M8DGnFM3/LtlA5Q71r5v9tBfuDCQsZXL1eGGN4A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.147.7 with SMTP id v7mr4999979iod.3.1462999522402; Wed, 11 May 2016 13:45:22 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: phluid61@gmail.com
Received: by 10.107.138.230 with HTTP; Wed, 11 May 2016 13:45:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.107.138.230 with HTTP; Wed, 11 May 2016 13:45:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <01Q01K03ULG000005M@mauve.mrochek.com>
References: <570D4C99.1030405@dcrocker.net> <CACweHND-OX+5okkJ+oE=6UN84x+CFtPBpMnU8HqaPbgQgJ_oWA@mail.gmail.com> <570E2510.4040408@ninebynine.org> <CACweHNCLS+QU2QveqYjkuPnDybbm-dtX9qQPsO4tTkgUoc5QYg@mail.gmail.com> <5710953E.5040505@gmx.de> <CACweHNDuDnP4P-4suUaFpS0OX-CbAYxn39jsZ3O_s-KYn=qbKw@mail.gmail.com> <a16b7cf5-3635-a3cb-b743-850f4047f862@gmx.de> <B3F27B33707E397A452D158D@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <6f2915b6-d36b-fbf6-f8a5-e35cf646faeb@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <88F1BC9BE8337F5D3B95E1BA@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <01Q01K03ULG000005M@mauve.mrochek.com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 06:45:22 +1000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: HC-xqyxktA-edGuO-0B2YKX9VoQ
Message-ID: <CACweHNATdZxvjjbPswiZUCghjFUEMV-7sYyG+J7c096BZd2uLA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>
To: Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c055f68d6e6c30532971e04
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/O6WmdYSWzgJiC8ruJKlynrELOSc>
Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-appsawg-file-scheme@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Review of draft-ietf-appsawg-file-scheme
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 20:45:30 -0000

On 12/05/2016 1:33 AM, "Ned Freed" <ned.freed@mrochek.com> wrote:
>
> I therefore think the best thing is to document the situation as best
> we can and be done with it. This is supposed to be a specification
> for a URL scheme; there's no reqruiement that such documents also serve
> as a BCP.
>

I agree. I think I've almost worked out how to cut the Encoding section
back appropriately; I'll send some text to the group once I hace it, to see
if it covers it.