IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] font/*

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Wed, 09 November 2011 18:11 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15E0C21F84BD for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 10:11:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.935
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.935 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.336, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DddgIo2OAwYR for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 10:11:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 523BA21F84BA for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 10:11:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 09 Nov 2011 18:11:22 -0000
Received: from mail.greenbytes.de (EHLO [192.168.1.140]) [217.91.35.233] by mail.gmx.net (mp010) with SMTP; 09 Nov 2011 19:11:22 +0100
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/fqTg/Md7fVfRw2R5O6GJP6qUhJeHedpNFwWXK9p UY+ipeWFLx9mRR
Message-ID: <4EBAC242.8020304@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 19:11:14 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
References: <4EB86078.8070904@stpeter.im> <4EB8E7FA.5030406@ninebynine.org> <4EBABEB4.2000108@gmx.de> <7E4D8B6B-5674-4423-B1D9-31956D8D564A@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <7E4D8B6B-5674-4423-B1D9-31956D8D564A@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: apps-discuss Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] font/*
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 18:11:37 -0000

On 2011-11-09 19:01, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> ...
> The genesis for the current thread, I thought, was the websec WG's work on font-sniffing. "What might I do different" would be "do security checks", I believe. Folks who are more active on websec can answer this better.
> ...

I think we got here because somebody claimed that font types don't have 
registered media types, because, some time ago, the IETF didn't want to 
register the top level type. Which, of course, is a totally separate issue.

Best regards, Julian

v2.19.0 | Report a Bug | By Email