[apps-discuss] JSON Patch

"Paul C. Bryan" <paul.bryan@forgerock.com> Tue, 01 November 2011 22:43 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.bryan@forgerock.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9554C1F0C4C for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Nov 2011 15:43:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aHtlMvYawcKx for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Nov 2011 15:43:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eu1sys200aog116.obsmtp.com (eu1sys200aog116.obsmtp.com [207.126.144.141]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 1AF2C1F0C36 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Nov 2011 15:43:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-f47.google.com ([209.85.213.47]) (using TLSv1) by eu1sys200aob116.postini.com ([207.126.147.11]) with SMTP; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 22:43:33 UTC
Received: by ywf9 with SMTP id 9so8573550ywf.20 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 15:43:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.101.37.14 with SMTP id p14mr415822anj.111.1320187384656; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 15:43:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.8] (S0106a021b762dbb3.vf.shawcable.net. [174.1.40.184]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m33sm1200500ann.4.2011.11.01.15.43.03 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 01 Nov 2011 15:43:04 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <1320187375.2622.25.camel@neutron>
From: "Paul C. Bryan" <paul.bryan@forgerock.com>
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 15:42:55 -0700
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-LG9oM+03B+92eIRWA5se"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.3-2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: [apps-discuss] JSON Patch
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 22:43:34 -0000

I have published and have been maintaining a JSON Patch Internet-Draft:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pbryan-json-patch-02

There's now at least three actively maintained implementations in as
many programming languages. Interest has been expressed in moving this
toward an RFC. I've discussed this briefly with Mark Nottingham, Pete
Resnick and Peter Saint-Andre, and consensus seems to be to raise this
with APPSAWG and see if there's any interest in developing this on a
standards track.

Thoughts?

Paul