IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Mail client configuration via WebFinger

Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no> Mon, 08 February 2016 08:36 UTC

Return-Path: <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 885531ACD84 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 00:36:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VGqcKjA8affZ for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 00:36:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from strange.aox.org (strange.aox.org [IPv6:2001:4d88:100c::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A49E61ACD85 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 00:36:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fri.gulbrandsen.priv.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by strange.aox.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 434F7FA007C; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 08:36:18 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gulbrandsen.priv.no; s=mail; t=1454920578; bh=UJ5VdOeZzGfOdewT1aKn2mTKutXaaJFzVI4/Ps1DgRs=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ZT8oey1+1ukuVucqACChpJVIYiAjzHuk/6mOBJC9uEd8ntC509QjpIZ8KiDUmG6jj 1wuSEkS23xRk57+FaCn4RgVCdQaPm9ITmiMACUisrj0Z6ZiOWNtdsNyfQrhA9EAvyD YVwYmKvrOu60qB2CQRFq+daY/Qr4l28V59fWmelI=
Received: from arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no by fri.gulbrandsen.priv.no (Archiveopteryx 3.2.0) with esmtpsa id 1454920577-28409-19604/11/5; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 08:36:17 +0000
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 08:36:16 +0000
User-Agent: Trojita/v0.5-9-g8961725; Qt/4.8.6; X11; Linux; Debian GNU/Linux 8.2 (jessie)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <13c2c0d0-60a6-4289-9a1d-df21bd43c5d8@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
In-Reply-To: <EE5D283AC957E10DA443AA15@JcK-HP8200.jck.com>
References: <em72874602-962e-43e1-90d2-497acacceffd@sydney> <EE5D283AC957E10DA443AA15@JcK-HP8200.jck.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/apps-discuss/OHa35I7_2ypwZl5G8JtozHpQoEs>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Mail client configuration via WebFinger
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 08:36:22 -0000

John C Klensin writes:
> Again, see above.  This isn't a strong pitch for ACAP, but is
> just a thought about the possibility of a well-known tool with
> which we have significant experience as an alternate starting
> point.

I tried implementing ACAP in a client and suggest forgetting about it. Such 
is my experience.

Arnt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email