Re: [apps-discuss] DMARC working group charter proposal
Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Tue, 02 April 2013 00:37 UTC
Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56DBC21F8F31 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 17:37:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hNSkfWkvb9-m for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 17:37:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65A4B21F844F for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 17:37:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.3] (unknown [71.237.13.154]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8965E40D3A; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 18:47:22 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <515A2858.2000907@stpeter.im>
Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 18:37:44 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <CAL0qLwYc757fw_VhPMHDrgcCimNFak02brDRLAVTq+NR4w34pA@mail.gmail.com> <5159D7A4.4000701@cs.tcd.ie> <CAL0qLwa0JtksC7iE_noz_ZC1L-NQU1EyH1X=dcrkPL-4UWJ-yA@mail.gmail.com> <515A0895.2090209@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <515A0895.2090209@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] DMARC working group charter proposal
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2013 00:37:44 -0000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 4/1/13 4:22 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote: > > > On 04/01/2013 11:16 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: >> Hi Stephen, >> >> We've already had this very conversation, so we're aware of the >> issue. The text we have was an attempt to re-create the same >> constraints DKIM had, preferring no changes, but not completely >> proscribing it either. It sounds like we have a little more text >> massaging to do to make it clear that's where were trying to go. > > Right. If the outcome is charter text like we had with DKIM that'd > be fine. FWIW, the initial charter for DKIM said: > > "Experimentation has resulted in Internet deployment of these > specifications. Although not encouraged, non-backwards-compatible > changes to these specifications will be acceptable if the DKIM > working group determines that the changes are required to meet the > group's technical objectives." > > I don't know if that's something that'd work for dmarc but I think > it does hit the right note, and I think with DKIM that worked fine. > (But I'm biased of course;-) FWIW, the original XMPP WG (2002) had the following text in its charter regarding backward compatibility with the existing implementations and deployments of the Jabber protocols... Although not encouraged, non-backwards-compatible changes to the basis specifications will be acceptable if the working group determines that the changes are required to meet the group's technical objectives and the group clearly documents the reasons for making them. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRWihYAAoJEOoGpJErxa2pkCUP/ib6dD0n1x6ZkU9Lp2eOYm2j fVjYu19NAHWsFTn2u1A+aiKntAFJeYv9/GxnPxF6aUja3sKfNE1rQ6fgfuU30Lp5 9fQ0T9X9jc86dhO1gBXNLPhPOTjRTnOh19Si4Yed2go/LJfvbIHDvfJx70CqS5l1 u4LV8HY/wbdiA3pqZFzyzymv9Oa3CfHIXZXK2CQmefPIgIuGt4qfk3QiSt0THi5m XurUPi8TQg7QH/6xr5E3D3yzWEQHpNd3Bm9tKUYttm3fqVevgzDwfFUCAnsJ3k0y SDEcS0KhN3ObHkLWW+6Y3pGWJQnFZnu4Ymisbgi0Qg+at5hvVSNCRrJV6qQxG3ZO ETuFT80Tath5dfmGCz072MxoriSuIuwJPlm3qY7/WB1D2D33JQt3oqZ+xefSLVOp f7x5mW//YkKAQXcnB7/og2HRxq6CjMR4kggPA9GuDEDDwBdKTdbEPZVLIZyScrvl 5nBX6O+LfLrZ3gp8m7X5Yq50DynXMzq0kfB1FvRE3d1VSUmn3u/6ftmVcs+NU/Sw KThwr3ollLlRCYhf3AVSFCECcD8/wIiv9uQNvk9Q3ik0npdroRD6JYo3UmUtgghH yu+mo1Gi+ZixH7A0SIsE5y9XWtcoqBwv0fiVxqgKqHkyGG0fWJnD22GJfTD7o6qu IiPhoeSb04F+vYw9ECBt =M72/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- [apps-discuss] DMARC working group charter propos… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [apps-discuss] DMARC working group charter pr… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [apps-discuss] DMARC working group charter pr… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [apps-discuss] DMARC working group charter pr… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [apps-discuss] DMARC working group charter pr… Dave Crocker
- Re: [apps-discuss] DMARC working group charter pr… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [apps-discuss] DMARC working group charter pr… Dave Crocker
- Re: [apps-discuss] DMARC working group charter pr… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [apps-discuss] DMARC working group charter pr… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [apps-discuss] DMARC working group charter pr… Dave Crocker
- Re: [apps-discuss] DMARC working group charter pr… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [apps-discuss] DMARC working group charter pr… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [apps-discuss] DMARC working group charter pr… Dave Crocker
- Re: [apps-discuss] DMARC working group charter pr… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [apps-discuss] DMARC working group charter pr… SM
- Re: [apps-discuss] DMARC working group charter pr… Dave Crocker
- Re: [apps-discuss] DMARC working group charter pr… SM
- Re: [apps-discuss] DMARC working group charter pr… Dave Crocker
- Re: [apps-discuss] DMARC working group charter pr… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [apps-discuss] DMARC working group charter pr… Barry Leiba
- Re: [apps-discuss] DMARC working group charter pr… Dave Crocker
- Re: [apps-discuss] DMARC working group charter pr… Barry Leiba
- Re: [apps-discuss] DMARC working group charter pr… Dave Crocker
- Re: [apps-discuss] DMARC working group charter pr… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [apps-discuss] DMARC working group charter pr… Dave Crocker
- Re: [apps-discuss] DMARC working group charter pr… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [apps-discuss] DMARC working group charter pr… Dave Crocker
- Re: [apps-discuss] DMARC working group charter pr… Stephen Farrell