IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc5451bis-03.txt

Scott Kitterman <scott@kitterman.com> Mon, 20 May 2013 17:44 UTC

Return-Path: <scott@kitterman.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40B2E21F8ADF for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 May 2013 10:44:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BQ2XUU0rY-9X for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 May 2013 10:44:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout02.controlledmail.com (mailout02.controlledmail.com [72.81.252.18]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 261C021F8B33 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 May 2013 10:44:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout02.controlledmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailout02.controlledmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97FDC20E40D6; Mon, 20 May 2013 13:44:11 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=kitterman.com; s=2007-00; t=1369071851; bh=WHBYK2gjxGXz+K+XYrs+Cd29B9MZGDbTM82bDri0XBo=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Pgsg3/3MUhNmlIzOBU9pxEv/0IfPszUSyLhztDNKQXPCsZy3nYMZRsP0ZuOihPf1U AHfZx4XaX9J/pB6Hn0EKQ/MTpzZc7201Hio9i6zIV8o2Uv+KDnel50IrCyeVx5oK1y JRF3nSQWkG/E07suyLmju1tNu2zQaBwlom/I94wk=
Received: from scott-latitude-e6320.localnet (121.sub-70-192-199.myvzw.com [70.192.199.121]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailout02.controlledmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6F66120E40D4; Mon, 20 May 2013 13:44:11 -0400 (EDT)
From: Scott Kitterman <scott@kitterman.com>
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 13:44:10 -0400
Message-ID: <3292745.WyJaIicSVt@scott-latitude-e6320>
User-Agent: KMail/4.10.2 (Linux/3.8.0-21-generic; KDE/4.10.2; i686; ; )
In-Reply-To: <20130520173236.69335.qmail@joyce.lan>
References: <20130520173236.69335.qmail@joyce.lan>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc5451bis-03.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 17:44:17 -0000

On Monday, May 20, 2013 05:32:36 PM John Levine wrote:
> >This incorporates the last of the WGLC feedback, including reverting the
> >ABNF change that introduced a backward compatibility issue.
> 
> I'm confused. The -04 draft still says:
> 
> authres-header = "Authentication-Results:" [CFWS] authserv-id
>               [ [CFWS] "/" [CFWS] version ]
>               ( [CFWS] ";" [CFWS] "none" / 1*resinfo ) [CFWS] CRLF
> 
> The slash is still there and the CFWS before it is still optional.
> Was there some other compatibility issue?

Now I'm confused.  I see -03 as that latest and it says:

     authres-header = "Authentication-Results:" [CFWS] authserv-id
              [ [CFWS] authres-version ]
              ( [CFWS] ";" [CFWS] "none" / 1*resinfo ) [CFWS] CRLF
            ; the special case of "none" is used to indicate that no
            ; message authentication is performed

Scott K

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email