Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ohye-canonical-link-relation-00.txt

[Bjartur Thorlacius <[e-mail]>]

Þann fös  1.júl 2011 15:40, skrifaði Mykyta Yevstifeyev:
> Old:
>> o The source URI of a "300 Multiple Choices" URI (Section 10.3.1 of
>> [RFC2616]) or a permanent redirect (Section 10.3.2 of [RFC2616]).
> New:
>> o The source URI, which defines a resource which provides choice
>> in different represntations of a given resource, ientified by
>> the context URI, or is a link which has been permanently replaced
>> by an other one.
> etc.
Your wording seems overly confusing. Which is the resource that 
"provides choice in different represntations of a given resource?" A 
standard could be assigned the URI <http://example.org/spec>. An HTTP 
GET /spec might be responded with an HTTP/1.1 300 choice, and an entity 
linking to /spec.node.html, /spec.html, /spec.pdf, and /spec.txt. The 
resource (the standard, that is) would in no way provide this choice. 
The HTTP server simply offered multiple representations.