Re: [apps-discuss] draft IETF 80 minutes

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Thu, 14 April 2011 13:39 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 401F8E0896 for <apps-discuss@ietfc.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 06:39:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lrl+ThmL0f-5 for <apps-discuss@ietfc.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 06:39:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (stpeter.im [207.210.219.233]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F336E0768 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 06:39:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from squire.local (dsl-251-69.dynamic-dsl.frii.net [216.17.251.69]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E071240D20; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 07:43:00 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <4DA6F929.9070004@stpeter.im>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 07:39:53 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Bernie Hoeneisen <bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch>
References: <4DA66102.4060200@stpeter.im> <BANLkTimL1jn2__2wf7nMwsrPB3tAN90qKg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1104141414030.1653@softronics.hoeneisen.ch>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1104141414030.1653@softronics.hoeneisen.ch>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
OpenPGP: url=http://www.saint-andre.com/me/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms020507050804060609020303"
Cc: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] draft IETF 80 minutes
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 13:39:56 -0000

On 4/14/11 6:29 AM, Bernie Hoeneisen wrote:

>   Question: Why shut down ENUM and not work on that there?
>   Answer: IETF Leadership wants ENUM WG to be shut down (outlived its
>   useful life). Furthermore, the issues with this document are in
>   the Calendaring space (as opposed to ENUM).

Fixed.

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/