[apps-discuss] Feedback on draft-moonesamy-rfc2369bis-01 and draft-moonesamy-rfc2919bis-01

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Wed, 04 January 2012 20:59 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9BA111E80B5 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 12:59:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iYAiGaaP0snN for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 12:59:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22EA811E809F for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 12:59:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([41.136.239.222]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q04Kwrc7008223 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 12:59:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1325710745; i=@elandsys.com; bh=4qpgPNCYRDdawB8PAnCOWrKKRCT+HzmhrHm7DosFl3g=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=G1ww4N5zDUoLv3mn0Amaq/E1CA5nCKepV/sAb7hk9/LvZ5A7KZkFnVSti0Ez1Pgrb OX9Ao356Qz8kf8BqigFOQv7VfG9Rk8VYCSO68iSZ+BjgaiO7/NqxPIQp82rfcDTP9I iUXImBQeMhfNz+3T4Sj4XxBaLcCC80QHrf35JRIE=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20120104113753.0a6e00e0@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 12:18:06 -0800
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Subject: [apps-discuss] Feedback on draft-moonesamy-rfc2369bis-01 and draft-moonesamy-rfc2919bis-01
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 20:59:12 -0000

Hello,

I would appreciate some feedback on draft-moonesamy-rfc2369bis-01 [1] 
and draft-moonesamy-rfc2919bis-01 [2].  The I-Ds are about the List- 
header fields.

The changes from RFC 2369 are:

   o  URL changed to URI

   o  Replaced MTAs with mailing list managers in the sentence: "MTAs
      generating the header fields SHOULD".

   o   Replaced MTAs with mailing list managers in the sentence: "MTAs
       MUST NOT insert whitespace within the brackets" in Section 2

   o  In Section 2, client application SHOULD ignore whitespace within
       brackets

   o  Updated references

   o  Added informative reference to RFC 5064

   o  Editorial changes

   o  Removed Background Discussion

The changes from  RFC 2919 are:

   o  Removed text about the domain name system and domain ownership in
      Section 2

   o  "localhost" replaced with "invalid"

   o  Replaced MTAs with mailing list managers in the sentence: "MTAs
       MUST NOT insert whitespace within the brackets" in Section 3

   o  Case independence in Section 6 changed to case insensitivity for
      ASCII

   o  Added a paragraph in the appendix about subject tags

   o  Updated references

   o  Editorial changes

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

[1] http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-moonesamy-rfc2369bis-01.txt
[2] http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-moonesamy-rfc2919bis-01.txt