Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Mailing List
Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Sun, 08 April 2012 19:00 UTC
Return-Path: <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CA1F21F854D for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 12:00:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.398
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.835, BAYES_40=-0.185, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WERVI9QggiGo for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 12:00:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gy0-f172.google.com (mail-gy0-f172.google.com [209.85.160.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7147A21F860F for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 12:00:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ghbg16 with SMTP id g16so1840473ghb.31 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 08 Apr 2012 12:00:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=ztINZJ+Ux0NTMYz5P2jG9REee4T2wl0Y5ePinS2c75c=; b=VZ1rfiOmugn47YrjWf2qHg8Udrtb5CUAcBytgHsM6unx9UXR8ytiQ+zv8Wy68k02jg pFWP6Fq/XLkrTe4GxoOIKzNmdgDZTn3WCm6kxaAfRHh7K1IJPrliZI4DmewA93D55jFK jxaP3GgaGtykwieu9sEFpx+Q+RejkXGwpdz2Z4zBhCn2UQzN2ja06gaslKLePNu+LBBx XZNF8flP1ODBVNnsurWsuMEuEYLqqKbmPJe2bqwnQ1PZuwt1Vj4zi6emLNq59eEfWuSG keDmD0ExUdwf92Z553HVWCZ8qQ+DrxvGVJTPrXsVLBeIhvCK8U00xQtXoYfm/u/zIs53 Pe7w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.236.79.40 with SMTP id h28mr3977032yhe.50.1333911631076; Sun, 08 Apr 2012 12:00:31 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com
Received: by 10.146.230.1 with HTTP; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 12:00:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CACwuEiOUq7FEbEt1c33M9cRz3tMvDG=feYb5jTRLvwXDPSgztw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4F5ADDCA.80303@KingsMountain.com> <CACwuEiPuvW=DxpwHjcOMs+_T9-4YaBSMB+rm-1LX_nJoswk_qg@mail.gmail.com> <CAK3OfOiQ1=c+Dr56jN02HCzVSUyUaFoLG96Aq=1Ru4sMFdttaA@mail.gmail.com> <CACwuEiNfA0waTd6ypLotg+=jus6N4JDw8F4T2o04hnfqTXNL1A@mail.gmail.com> <4F60968D.4020703@stpeter.im> <D50DAB3A-39D0-486F-A329-002DA3DE309A@tzi.org> <CAGQP0AFJnfrNqM2MRWvEVzJzFvU94mntA8mFeJLz3gGqMa61xw@mail.gmail.com> <CACwuEiPgr8ovD2hB8nH2kpjLwck2cNTV52j3T=su-x1atxnjwA@mail.gmail.com> <CAGQP0AEEodF1UeZCR_5Mdf0RjMKQZZFAeyaDBx+OJNH_cvGT_Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAGQP0AGHyJKw-LyYS1TiANBoDb5BxNEjY_g8z5nni-tY3FMfUA@mail.gmail.com> <CACwuEiOUq7FEbEt1c33M9cRz3tMvDG=feYb5jTRLvwXDPSgztw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2012 15:00:30 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: ws3Gvem-Mroj6LyzyN8a9lOkNs8
Message-ID: <CAC4RtVAVskwy8kWkra40UA7ZaPdoAr6YeKR-Ltfz8VFboPS6LQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: Walter <walter.stanish@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Mailing List
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2012 19:00:33 -0000
> Is there any news from Area Managers regarding the status of the > creation of the proposed list as previously advised? The purpose of non-working-group email lists on the IETF servers is to provide a place for discussion of things related to IETF work -- an offshoot of existing work, perhaps, a proposal for new work that needs some fleshing out, or maybe a discussion of issues that we think will lead to new work some time later. The ADs are not convinced that the work proposed here is best done in the IETF, nor that it's likely to develop into something that kicks off new IETF work later. That view seems backed by most comments by others in the discussion of the proposal on the apps-discuss list. Walter has also said that there are a good number of participants ready to work on financial protocols here, if only we would create a list for it, but has shown no evidence of it, and all requests from the ADs for such evidence -- in the form of actual posts from people expressing interest in working on this here -- have been responded to by statements, both on and off the list, that we can't reasonably expect people to post here first, but that once we have a proper mailing list, they'll show up and work. Despite that, the ADs have been inclined to create a list and see what happens. But discussion at the Paris meeting continued the skepticism from the community that such a list will do anything useful for IETF work. In addition, there were several outright objections to creating the list. Apart from concern about the resources spent in the management of it, applications-area participants point out that there are many places outside the IETF to get free mailing lists for discussion... and there's a worry that an IETF list may simply be used to claim that the IETF backs this work (which it doesn't, at least not yet), and perhaps, worse, that it backs it in preference to other related proposals. Given the clear consensus in the Applications Area, the Applications ADs have decided NOT to create the proposed mailing list. We suggest that the proponents use Google, Yahoo!, or some other free service to discuss their proposals with their many interested collaborators, and consider coming to the IETF with a BoF proposal or working group proposal when things are more solidly defined and ready to start real protocol work. Walter: We understand that you will not be happy with this response, but this is clearly the consensus of the Applications Area participants and we tend to agree with them. That said, we do want to add that many of your messages, particularly the private ones to us, can best be described as impatient and at worst, mean spirited, implying that any refusal to create this mailing list only proves that the IETF is a useless organization and that you'd simply "take your ball and go home." That's probably not the best way to gain the cooperation of the community. We did set that aside (indeed, asking the rest of the community, which was unaware of the content of our off-list messages) and decided based on the potential benefits to the Internet and the IETF, and the consensus of community. Barry and Pete, Applications Area Directors
- [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Mailin… Walter
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Barry Leiba
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Walter
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Ted Hardie
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Dave Crocker
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Dave Crocker
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… =JeffH
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Barry Leiba
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Walter
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… John Levine
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Walter
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Walter
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Dave Crocker
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… John Levine
- [apps-discuss] Running code ... Scott Kitterman
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Barry Leiba
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Walter
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Dave Crocker
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Walter
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… =JeffH
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Walter
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Walter
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Nico Williams
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Walter
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Jorge Timón
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Walter
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Walter
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Walter
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Jorge Timón
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Jorge Timón
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Walter
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Walter
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Barry Leiba
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Walter
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Barry Leiba
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Walter
- Re: [apps-discuss] Proposal for a Finance Area Ma… Carsten Bormann
- [apps-discuss] Payment Protocols -- was Re: Propo… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [apps-discuss] Payment Protocols -- was Re: P… SM
- Re: [apps-discuss] Payment Protocols -- was Re: P… Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)