Re: [apps-discuss] [Uri-review] Provisional URI registrations
Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com> Mon, 22 November 2010 14:23 UTC
Return-Path: <evnikita2@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AAE53A6A8F; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 06:23:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.962, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.96]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n-q6CWUmjlfG; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 06:23:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-bw0-f44.google.com (mail-bw0-f44.google.com [209.85.214.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E87AC28C0D0; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 06:23:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by bwz12 with SMTP id 12so6611356bwz.31 for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 06:24:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NtKLdlQ8Svh8mDJ2iZPLxYCSJwcW67NG7U4JY/iTSsE=; b=lJ6+qIS8tFYXnrVFcYlHPU2Yzv05+LLZs6vMZaLokDtHqY0rV6RTTQk5Zg+6VjNBfg 9eniGdgjVTadzL8GV6DbFTKSdNFV9b7J5kfp00Eo9Z0gOs+Ir9tzSf3omcQ4qOyNBMAt WEoNLefWyD6LejvyHdEz02tRs/R9X2RVRQq1M=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Oc4nbpLl/3rOX7bYZbodGEoJaFsxfW7+wK1A+EQHF6zdkdhkRmwoiBtQA8QUSG8C2M FupvenDqcP+rqt++JWDZuUxcOK++8TAnepq26BnOX+VUXTtx/MWRjLBEb7ZNv4tEDsJn UX8D89Dt1xugnoUvs7hLcG85hwUHOACAy9wq8=
Received: by 10.204.79.131 with SMTP id p3mr5352329bkk.178.1290435861723; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 06:24:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([195.191.104.134]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d27sm2452996bkw.14.2010.11.22.06.24.19 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 22 Nov 2010 06:24:19 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4CEA7D15.6000801@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 16:24:21 +0200
From: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; ru; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
References: <A232FF7C06EE5B1C0F886130@PST.JCK.COM> <4CE99C5D.9040601@ninebynine.org>
In-Reply-To: <4CE99C5D.9040601@ninebynine.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: uri-review@ietf.org, apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] [Uri-review] Provisional URI registrations
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 14:23:47 -0000
22.11.2010 0:25, Graham Klyne wrote: > We have "permanent", "provisional" and "historical" registration > classes for URI schemes. For practical purposes, I think the > "provisional" registry serves the same role as the "reserved" one you > suggest [1]. I think the additional bureaucracy incurred to create a > new registry class is not justified by practical benefit. It's easy > enough to add some commentary to the registration template I can't agree with that. 'Provisional' means 'not to be used as not specified' while 'Reserved' means 'not to be used NOW and not to be specified NOW (wait until are moved to 'Provisional')'. We have difference between these two terms. Mykyta Yevstifeyev
- [apps-discuss] Provisional URI registrations (was… John C Klensin
- Re: [apps-discuss] Provisional URI registrations Graham Klyne
- Re: [apps-discuss] Provisional URI registrations Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [apps-discuss] Provisional URI registrations John C Klensin
- Re: [apps-discuss] Provisional URI registrations Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [apps-discuss] Provisional URI registrations Graham Klyne
- Re: [apps-discuss] [Uri-review] Provisional URI r… Mykyta Yevstifeyev
- Re: [apps-discuss] [Uri-review] Provisional URI r… Graham Klyne