Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard

Frank Ellermann <> Thu, 30 June 2011 08:02 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4045521F86B4 for <>; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 01:02:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.799
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL=0.5, J_CHICKENPOX_55=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 04mohdjWT0Ye for <>; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 01:02:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id B01B021F86B3 for <>; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 01:02:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pzk5 with SMTP id 5so2101942pzk.31 for <>; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 01:02:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=6Ym+MhX4kdthS0OARKxV4+v1khGXXwPXHZGgQu89pmc=; b=YzMjUkdqdDWW8kmthSbrc/MxT7fYLevCFkeLi49tuo0riZxnY+RZWs2o/sWgr6DnLt Q1P0qijo4Jhcj06UyVzdouRm12hJfqzsGJtaiE3Pvr3u0fUiffAJBTprCVfLpGUG4dOx NBXSf+cuWnxpPYUYAicl/4M0YSikRo/EWpl04=
Received: by with SMTP id n14mr820689wfj.437.1309420932076; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 01:02:12 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by with HTTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 01:01:52 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <0EC26EB10287E2A20769C9CC@PST.JCK.COM> <> <> <> <>
From: Frank Ellermann <>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 10:01:52 +0200
Message-ID: <>
To: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: Apps-discuss list <>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-holsten-about-uri-scheme-06.txt> (The 'about' URI scheme) to Proposed Standard
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 08:02:13 -0000

On 29 June 2011 10:25, Mykyta Yevstifeyev quoted:

>> For a number of now-in-use, though not special-purpose, 'about'
>> URIs the reader would be pointed to

IBTD, Wikipedia relies on 3rd party sources, not the other way
around.  And Wikipedia pointers in RFCs should use permalinks
to specific versions of articles.  I could edit this article in
a totally unsuited way, and it could take hours or days until
somebody reverts it to a reasonable state.  Worse, many folks
know how to circumvent Wikipedia rules in hard to detect ways
(for articles not on many watchlists).

The current draft does not have any additional examples, so for
the third time I urge you to add about:about as *good* example -
nobody claims that it works everywhere, let alone as it should,
or that it needs to be registered.  But for users and developers
it would be very helpful if they can learn which relevant about:
URIs exist in the product they are interested in.