[apps-discuss] FW: New Version Notification for draft-mavrogiannopoulos-tpmuri-00.txt

<Carolin.Latze@swisscom.com> Fri, 12 April 2013 14:36 UTC

Return-Path: <Carolin.Latze@swisscom.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FF0921F89DB for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 07:36:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3ogc6n2oT6E0 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 07:36:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.swisscom.com (outmail110.swisscom.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FD6E21F86E8 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 07:36:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.swisscom.com; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 16:36:26 +0200
From: Carolin.Latze@swisscom.com
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Thread-Topic: New Version Notification for draft-mavrogiannopoulos-tpmuri-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHN9XobJZBB8IyfJkicwT854E/ymZjTKz+A
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 14:36:24 +0000
Message-ID: <2FFA20399C56CD49B5BEEAD147D58DE54097E901@sg000710.corproot.net>
In-Reply-To: <20130118124816.19028.15269.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, de-CH
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <7C2283FCABC7824CBB163AEC27C4DE54@swisscom.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [apps-discuss] FW: New Version Notification for draft-mavrogiannopoulos-tpmuri-00.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 14:36:29 -0000

Hi all

In January, we submitted an I-D that described how you can identify keys
that are stored inside a TPM. Just recently we learned that it might be of
interest for the the appsarea to discuss this I-D.

This proposal has been inspired by the PKCS#11 URI. We believe that those
URIs are a great possibility to identify keys stored in security modules
in order to use them for instance in standard TLS libraries. Although the
TPM has a PKCS#11 interface (well let's put it like this:  it is possible
to create a PKCS#11 interface around a TPM), it is much more common and
powerful to work without such an interface. Therefore we propose to define
another URI for TPM secured keys.

Best regards

On 1/18/13 1:48 PM, "internet-drafts@ietf.org" <internet-drafts@ietf.org>

>A new version of I-D, draft-mavrogiannopoulos-tpmuri-00.txt
>has been successfully submitted by Carolin Latze and posted to the
>IETF repository.
>Filename:	 draft-mavrogiannopoulos-tpmuri
>Revision:	 00
>Title:		 The TPMKEY URI Scheme
>Creation date:	 2013-01-18
>WG ID:		 Individual Submission
>Number of pages: 6
>   This memo specifies a TPMKEY Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) Scheme
>   for identifying cryptographic keys stored in TPM chips and access
>   using the TCG Software Stack (TSS).  The URI is based on how TPM keys
>   are identified in the TSS specification.
>The IETF Secretariat