Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC on draft-ietf-appsawg-xdash-02.txt
SM <sm@resistor.net> Wed, 25 January 2012 03:36 UTC
Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 8BFE511E80A2 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:36:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.625
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No,
score=-102.625 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.026, BAYES_00=-2.599,
USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LBYFAiezBoB1 for
<apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:36:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com
[IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id
C55B911E8086 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>;
Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:36:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1])
(authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id
q0P3aCY6020097; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:36:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010;
t=1327462578; i=@resistor.net; bh=g608vU2Lpf2NZ5AehKCGsB52A+trDuCI0yMTtUMYJBc=;
h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type;
b=DPnaXfiNzmg07Y4bBjYZJY1u47y0GIbF4NwCX+diJoxsfAJaIxidVk5OiKE8wkTL2
D1GbA4hKucbICe9H2neJp7OTXhu0AcG1D7GS9764+/6PDpwLoG6SiVw5NCDVk+quFP
AKnSjLfSENjiMUKg+kDaQ6Z+N4eidm2T9J/GeOAE=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail;
t=1327462578; i=@resistor.net; bh=g608vU2Lpf2NZ5AehKCGsB52A+trDuCI0yMTtUMYJBc=;
h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type;
b=j+4HozURGCDXrswLhKivGhgObQc1sypGWQq2nX9/qMGkivZdcHpZDitGSyFpnfrsD
46yP0UhdZ2iBFeQm4Nz8BiqxdXQjyzwtsHpKGEzf0Qgq9D0xkxeKQVnb2awwe3yuCa
7Mx/+Qz7I2/2yezc0tAhIdWtO8Ktf4vXrKG+GZaw=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20120124185702.09ce6400@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:17:39 -0800
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <FAD2FBBB-E679-4867-81E6-3F1C472BCF04@vpnc.org>
References: <4EE2430E.4080501@isode.com> <4F1F1A72.1090302@isode.com>
<FAD2FBBB-E679-4867-81E6-3F1C472BCF04@vpnc.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC on draft-ietf-appsawg-xdash-02.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols
<apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>,
<mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>,
<mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 03:36:20 -0000
Hi Paul, At 15:03 24-01-2012, Paul Hoffman wrote: >A different way to do the document would be a single paragraph: >"People have thought about this topic for over a decade, probably >much harder than you are thinking about this now. They often >disagreed with each other, indicating that you are not thinking hard >enough about your current choices. Whatever you choose to do with >respect to not-yet-defined parameters, you will likely regret the >choice if your protocol is at all popular." Such a concise document >is much easier to read and much less likely to be noticed than the current one. The above express the idea in simple words. There aren't any RFC 2119 key words though. That's highly inappropriate for a BCP. :-) I suggest moving draft-ietf-appsawg-xdash-02 to Last Call it is written in a language which protocol designers ought to understand. Regards, -sm
- [apps-discuss] WGLC on draft-ietf-appsawg-xdash-0… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC on draft-ietf-appsawg-xda… SM
- Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC on draft-ietf-appsawg-xda… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC on draft-ietf-appsawg-xda… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC on draft-ietf-appsawg-xda… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC on draft-ietf-appsawg-xda… SM
- Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC on draft-ietf-appsawg-xda… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC on draft-ietf-appsawg-xda… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC on draft-ietf-appsawg-xda… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC on draft-ietf-appsawg-xda… SM
- Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC on draft-ietf-appsawg-xda… t.petch
- Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC on draft-ietf-appsawg-xda… Murray S. Kucherawy
- [apps-discuss] X-Original (was: WGLC on draft-iet… SM
- Re: [apps-discuss] X-Original (was: WGLC on draft… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC on draft-ietf-appsawg-xda… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC on draft-ietf-appsawg-xda… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC on draft-ietf-appsawg-xda… Zoltan Ordogh
- Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC on draft-ietf-appsawg-xda… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC on draft-ietf-appsawg-xda… Zoltan Ordogh
- Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC on draft-ietf-appsawg-xda… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC on draft-ietf-appsawg-xda… t.petch
- Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC on draft-ietf-appsawg-xda… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC on draft-ietf-appsawg-xda… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC on draft-ietf-appsawg-xda… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC on draft-ietf-appsawg-xda… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC on draft-ietf-appsawg-xda… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC on draft-ietf-appsawg-xda… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC on draft-ietf-appsawg-xda… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC on draft-ietf-appsawg-xda… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC on draft-ietf-appsawg-xda… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC on draft-ietf-appsawg-xda… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC on draft-ietf-appsawg-xda… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC on draft-ietf-appsawg-xda… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC on draft-ietf-appsawg-xda… t.petch
- Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC on draft-ietf-appsawg-xda… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC on draft-ietf-appsawg-xda… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC on draft-ietf-appsawg-xda… t.petch
- Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC on draft-ietf-appsawg-xda… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC on draft-ietf-appsawg-xda… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC on draft-ietf-appsawg-xda… Peter Saint-Andre