Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC on draft-ietf-appsawg-xdash-02.txt

SM <> Wed, 25 January 2012 03:36 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BFE511E80A2 for <>; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:36:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.625
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.625 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.026, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LBYFAiezBoB1 for <>; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:36:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id C55B911E8086 for <>; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:36:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from (IDENT:sm@localhost []) (authenticated bits=0) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q0P3aCY6020097; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:36:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple;; s=mail2010; t=1327462578;; bh=g608vU2Lpf2NZ5AehKCGsB52A+trDuCI0yMTtUMYJBc=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=DPnaXfiNzmg07Y4bBjYZJY1u47y0GIbF4NwCX+diJoxsfAJaIxidVk5OiKE8wkTL2 D1GbA4hKucbICe9H2neJp7OTXhu0AcG1D7GS9764+/6PDpwLoG6SiVw5NCDVk+quFP AKnSjLfSENjiMUKg+kDaQ6Z+N4eidm2T9J/GeOAE=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple;; s=mail; t=1327462578;; bh=g608vU2Lpf2NZ5AehKCGsB52A+trDuCI0yMTtUMYJBc=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=j+4HozURGCDXrswLhKivGhgObQc1sypGWQq2nX9/qMGkivZdcHpZDitGSyFpnfrsD 46yP0UhdZ2iBFeQm4Nz8BiqxdXQjyzwtsHpKGEzf0Qgq9D0xkxeKQVnb2awwe3yuCa 7Mx/+Qz7I2/2yezc0tAhIdWtO8Ktf4vXrKG+GZaw=
Message-Id: <>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:17:39 -0800
To: Paul Hoffman <>
From: SM <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <> <> <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] WGLC on draft-ietf-appsawg-xdash-02.txt
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 03:36:20 -0000

Hi Paul,
At 15:03 24-01-2012, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>A different way to do the document would be a single paragraph: 
>"People have thought about this topic for over a decade, probably 
>much harder than you are thinking about this now. They often 
>disagreed with each other, indicating that you are not thinking hard 
>enough about your current choices. Whatever you choose to do with 
>respect to not-yet-defined parameters, you will likely regret the 
>choice if your protocol is at all popular." Such a concise document 
>is much easier to read and much less likely to be noticed than the current one.

The above express the idea in simple words.  There aren't any RFC 
2119 key words though.  That's highly inappropriate for a BCP. :-)

I suggest moving draft-ietf-appsawg-xdash-02 to Last Call it is 
written in a language which protocol designers ought to understand.