Re: [apps-discuss] Applicability Statements
Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Wed, 11 May 2011 20:47 UTC
Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BCC3E0868 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 May 2011 13:47:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SZ9xzLPGn+mF for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 May 2011 13:47:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5871AE0866 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 May 2011 13:47:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from leavealone.cisco.com (72-163-0-129.cisco.com [72.163.0.129]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 08777400A6; Wed, 11 May 2011 14:47:03 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <4DCAF5C6.6070806@stpeter.im>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 14:47:02 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
References: <4DCAC1CB.3050905@qualcomm.com> <653ADDA5F1A34D89FA899549@PST.JCK.COM> <BANLkTinApNj8P+V6ze2d-AFWMCZbHXyaHA@mail.gmail.com> <4DCAF507.5030508@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4DCAF507.5030508@gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
OpenPGP: url=http://www.saint-andre.com/me/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="------------ms020702040406020608000901"
Cc: Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com>, John C Klensin <john@jck.com>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Applicability Statements
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 20:47:06 -0000
On 5/11/11 2:43 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > On 2011-05-12 06:04, Barry Leiba wrote: >>> I think this is entirely sensible. I've felt for some time that >>> we have underutilized the AS option. Sometimes we incorporate >>> AS elements into a TS, but it has been a long time since they >>> have been done standalone. You didn't mention it explicitly, >>> but use of AS documents eliminates another issue that has >>> annoyed lots of people about some BCPs: An AS is entirely >>> appropriate for recommendations about what we think is the least >>> bad thing to do under some set of circumstances. When we make >>> that sort of recommendation in a BCP, we expose ourselves to the >>> criticism that the recommendation is neither best (as distinct >>> from a bad compromise), nor current (as distinct from a >>> recommendation about future behavior), nor actively practiced. >> >> This is exactly what I'd have said if John hadn't said it. Or, put >> another way, "I support the publi...." No, wait. Um. >> >> Yes, let's go ahead with it. > > +1. I would recommend it to all Areas in fact, but it's good for > somebody to start. Pete dreamed this up as something we could try in the Applications Area, and I'm on board with it. Once we have some practical results to show to other area directors, we might convince them to try it, too. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
- [apps-discuss] Applicability Statements Pete Resnick
- Re: [apps-discuss] Applicability Statements John C Klensin
- Re: [apps-discuss] Applicability Statements Barry Leiba
- Re: [apps-discuss] Applicability Statements SM
- Re: [apps-discuss] Applicability Statements Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [apps-discuss] Applicability Statements Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [apps-discuss] Applicability Statements Pete Resnick
- [apps-discuss] We have no lambs (was: Applicabili… SM
- Re: [apps-discuss] We have no lambs (was: Applica… Barry Leiba
- Re: [apps-discuss] We have no lambs Stephen Farrell
- Re: [apps-discuss] Applicability Statements Martin J. Dürst
- [apps-discuss] On "supporting the publication of … John C Klensin
- Re: [apps-discuss] Applicability Statements Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [apps-discuss] Applicability Statements John C Klensin
- Re: [apps-discuss] Applicability Statements Dave CROCKER
- Re: [apps-discuss] Applicability Statements Nico Williams
- Re: [apps-discuss] On "supporting the publication… SM
- Re: [apps-discuss] Applicability Statements Pete Resnick
- Re: [apps-discuss] Applicability Statements Nico Williams
- Re: [apps-discuss] Applicability Statements Pete Resnick
- Re: [apps-discuss] Applicability Statements Nico Williams
- Re: [apps-discuss] Applicability Statements Dave Crocker
- Re: [apps-discuss] Applicability Statements Nico Williams
- Re: [apps-discuss] Applicability Statements Dave Crocker
- Re: [apps-discuss] Applicability Statements Nico Williams
- Re: [apps-discuss] Applicability Statements John C Klensin
- Re: [apps-discuss] Applicability Statements Pete Resnick
- Re: [apps-discuss] We have no lambs Pete Resnick
- Re: [apps-discuss] We have no lambs Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [apps-discuss] We have no lambs Barry Leiba
- Re: [apps-discuss] Applicability Statements John Levine
- Re: [apps-discuss] Applicability Statements t.petch
- Re: [apps-discuss] Applicability Statements Scott Brim
- Re: [apps-discuss] Applicability Statements Pete Resnick
- Re: [apps-discuss] Applicability Statements Pete Resnick