IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00 and our lawn -- feedback?

Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> Thu, 13 February 2014 14:28 UTC

Return-Path: <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC8ED1A0252 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 06:28:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4ugAjN37-jBq for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 06:28:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (jazz.viagenie.ca [IPv6:2620:0:230:8000::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36C311A0240 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 06:28:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from porto.nomis80.org (ringo.viagenie.ca [IPv6:2620:0:230:c000:3e97:eff:fe0b:dd8a]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 027E240222 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 09:28:37 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <52FCD695.4010806@viagenie.ca>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 09:28:37 -0500
From: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
References: <20140211223250.68983.qmail@joyce.lan> <B1C114F7-5FA4-49F7-880F-9E94FCB24BFA@mnot.net> <CAHBU6ituZwwpu0LNHNK0R=XXY1Y88ovgu+THEPBf49sORaP0_A@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1402130024550.2177@joyce.lan> <CAHBU6iua2Qv8kG9O2abme5eM6EZubMaOqm6pgpY0k2j8pCKmpg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHBU6iua2Qv8kG9O2abme5eM6EZubMaOqm6pgpY0k2j8pCKmpg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-00 and our lawn -- feedback?
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 14:28:41 -0000

Le 2014-02-13 00:42, Tim Bray a écrit :
> Suppose my server comes with a package where I have to route endpoints
> based on URL parameters, so the WEIRDS requests come in
> to “https://example.com?service=weirds" so that’s my registry value.  
> 
> In this case, appending /domain/whatever is going to result in a
> malformed URI reference, or at least one that’s going to cause all the
> standard parsing libraries trouble. 

Probably a naive question, just trying to understand: couldn't you
reverse proxy that server with a front-end that would rewrite the URIs?

Simon
-- 
DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca
NAT64/DNS64 open-source        --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server               --> http://numb.viagenie.ca

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email