Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-appsawg-received-state
Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Tue, 12 June 2012 14:53 UTC
Return-Path: <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 424EE21F86C3 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 07:53:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.976
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0EPiBtf71Nyq for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 07:53:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-f172.google.com (mail-lb0-f172.google.com [209.85.217.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ADA921F86BE for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 07:53:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lbbgo11 with SMTP id go11so627636lbb.31 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 07:53:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=VZWxomVpSxCL0GEIcDSvqYEQn4RzbsfVWRTsTB/fE3M=; b=D9NQbFDIZQZcKSYsM4upwxxqmDygfmbvukYejMIzA6CAQHrqaE+Ho91Y4S3HoukUJy p4tW02BLE4J2dh58GeZWnDscJsiSnP55XhI58w2aAugjDkrO16x5Rgjs4OsjrxpLKqU0 8IXqFCGr6HA160jgcP881O2vExRTzoC5y7poh2TzbjZTI3yEXSLjlJHpgYkRi7tF+dIw DqQ78dZHcR6vBp55E/ZSPQ9xh+JaERiWjJCKTzbOiKdPAhHob5aEiNMRr9fTjKt17PVF gK7LQESTCpW85kfwIqHhLFJdle8Y8ZsvV/pb5cKbjR7cGbSNk84kXwdzAFjthNOiiRtt l0cQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.112.98.231 with SMTP id el7mr4820947lbb.14.1339512826512; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 07:53:46 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com
Received: by 10.112.48.104 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 07:53:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <03a901cd487e$908c37c0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
References: <CAL0qLwY1DCP9RY7cykwrPi48A_1h_FJUXo5eRWkn3Rw=rFXpBw@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVBuET9h-QHEtS=genmJnJ6bfKk=KD0bTJQvZJApAsY_ww@mail.gmail.com> <4FD08CA3.6080504@dcrocker.net> <01OGEZDG0T8M000058@mauve.mrochek.com> <4FD29DF5.5010206@dcrocker.net> <CAC4RtVAbC64Bx67b6OD4LApy9p_K2xqAZYGAETHxXZE5gY0-oA@mail.gmail.com> <01OGGS87OI0Q000058@mauve.mrochek.com> <CAC4RtVBReXuj473yvkNt3nOL6AyEPkZpyjqgsd2-fF5SiFs_aQ@mail.gmail.com> <03a901cd487e$908c37c0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 16:53:46 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: F976SxaCzq5fbkV51oe3S5UP6vc
Message-ID: <CAC4RtVC18FB31Dwxa9rVrvC6oJGXGT1YKOwx1=ae-s_O4f7Rpw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f46d0401698332466104c247a2c4"
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-appsawg-received-state
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 14:53:51 -0000
> Expert Review gives us another bite of the cherry, FCFS assumes that the > originator and IANA have all the necessary skills. Or that the review isn't necessary. IANA is never expected to do such review. The arguments for FCFS here aren't that IANA can do it, but that for this registry review isn't necessary. Barry
- [apps-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-appsawg-rec… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-appsawg… Barry Leiba
- Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-appsawg… Dave Crocker
- Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-appsawg… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-appsawg… Dave Crocker
- Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-appsawg… Ned Freed
- Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-appsawg… Ned Freed
- Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-appsawg… Ned Freed
- Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-appsawg… Dave Crocker
- Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-appsawg… Dave Crocker
- Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-appsawg… Barry Leiba
- Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-appsawg… Ned Freed
- Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-appsawg… Ned Freed
- Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-appsawg… Barry Leiba
- Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-appsawg… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-appsawg… t.petch
- Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-appsawg… Barry Leiba
- Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-appsawg… Dave Crocker
- Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-appsawg… SM
- Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-appsawg… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-appsawg… SM
- Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-appsawg… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-appsawg… SM
- Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-appsawg… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-appsawg… Ned Freed
- Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-appsawg… Dave Crocker
- Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-appsawg… Barry Leiba
- Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on draft-ietf-appsawg… Ned Freed