Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc5451bis-04.txt

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Thu, 23 May 2013 15:41 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1714021F9780 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 May 2013 08:41:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -111.047
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-111.047 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.152, BAYES_00=-2.599, HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI=-4.3, RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED=-4.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cR-p26TKYZFu for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 May 2013 08:41:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from leila.iecc.com (leila6.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:4c:6569:6c61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34B1121F978C for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 May 2013 08:41:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 39874 invoked from network); 23 May 2013 15:41:46 -0000
Received: from leila.iecc.com (64.57.183.34) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 23 May 2013 15:41:46 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=519e38ba.xn--30v786c.k1305; i=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=DgG04UWGjfCx/G5GlmmcnyI/edteo8TYdvII7h+PHKM=; b=Pje+VC3kIWtjQ48KkQqaNQfDUKzC74GT2o+NKrE4qB3p4zW4bsIYpF0N/JHF/zfsT/qGYJyEOdWY/CNYGNz2W8QCilcYaVzPy0i8jJ7dh9iOwp4Fu9/8NzJhp7mhUcgnQh4vZH/uHUuIMKWVHiSI5tskGw6i36S795OZMQkh3bE=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=519e38ba.xn--30v786c.k1305; olt=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=DgG04UWGjfCx/G5GlmmcnyI/edteo8TYdvII7h+PHKM=; b=nEb2CkJ8ZCxSK3z72rNkyeWrLfc1p7b6eeIZ6v/cjRcUNsJ3Ope4sTkvTfODnHdK6TqsEyzvPWIgwBQKzqJv1KznAJYSbXeqVtJnEICQ5+ERdPtUEDy3c9wM0obElxyOzTPp5lR9nffGJrPRzjlVb0WhdXNS+UMhhllluYQN4qU=
Date: 23 May 2013 15:41:24 -0000
Message-ID: <20130523154124.25978.qmail@joyce.lan>
From: "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <519DCA5F.30207@tana.it>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Cc: vesely@tana.it
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-rfc5451bis-04.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 15:41:52 -0000

>> I believe the change from:
>> 
>> authres-header = "Authentication-Results:" [CFWS] authserv-id
>> 	[ CFWS version ]
>
>Note that in bis-04 it is:
>
> authres-header = "Authentication-Results:" [CFWS] authserv-id
>        [ [CFWS] authres-version ]

You're right. Adding the brackets is clearly a mistake since it makes
it impossible to tell where the authserv-id ends and the
authres-version starts.

R's,
John