IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Questions about Structured Syntax Suffixes (SSS)

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Thu, 24 May 2012 11:12 UTC

Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52E1D21F85F7 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 May 2012 04:12:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.963
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.963 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.364, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Omk1a+yTRNix for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 May 2012 04:12:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net (mxout-07.mxes.net [216.86.168.182]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F18E21F862A for <discuss@apps.ietf.org>; Thu, 24 May 2012 04:12:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mnot-mini.mnot.net (unknown [118.209.21.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 155B122E25B; Thu, 24 May 2012 07:12:51 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <4FBE16B1.2060801@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 21:12:51 +1000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0FE8C3AF-CFF1-4594-8B62-E88654129C70@mnot.net>
References: <832E3E94-723B-4DC9-A9D5-46EA7A7DB427@mnot.net> <4FBE16B1.2060801@gmx.de>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
Cc: Apps Discuss <discuss@apps.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Questions about Structured Syntax Suffixes (SSS)
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 11:12:58 -0000

On 24/05/2012, at 9:08 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:

>> We started this experiment with +xml, and I'm not aware of much software that uses that suffix to great advantage (please educate me if I'm overlooking something).
>> ...
> 
> XMLHttpRequest does.


Details...?


--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status