IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-shelby-exi-registration-01.txt

Tony Hansen <tony@att.com> Fri, 13 April 2012 21:06 UTC

Return-Path: <tony@att.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72C8711E8104 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 14:06:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.637
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.637 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.362, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_53=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sK+HHbha1H1L for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 14:06:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nbfkord-smmo05.seg.att.com (nbfkord-smmo05.seg.att.com [209.65.160.92]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BCA511E80F1 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 14:05:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unknown [144.160.20.145] (EHLO mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com) by nbfkord-smmo05.seg.att.com(mxl_mta-6.11.0-8) over TLS secured channel with ESMTP id 035988f4.0.2109483.00-293.5884636.nbfkord-smmo05.seg.att.com (envelope-from <tony@att.com>); Fri, 13 Apr 2012 21:05:53 +0000 (UTC)
X-MXL-Hash: 4f8895311522a8ff-bd5691934fd5ada0b907fc64804b0b083e7379c3
Received: from enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q3DL5qA0022689 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 17:05:52 -0400
Received: from sflint01.pst.cso.att.com (sflint01.pst.cso.att.com [144.154.234.228]) by mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q3DL5l0M022674 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 17:05:47 -0400
Received: from alpd052.aldc.att.com (alpd052.aldc.att.com [130.8.42.31]) by sflint01.pst.cso.att.com (RSA Interceptor) for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 17:05:13 -0400
Received: from aldc.att.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alpd052.aldc.att.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3DL5Da5023260 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 17:05:13 -0400
Received: from dns.maillennium.att.com (dns.maillennium.att.com [135.25.114.99]) by alpd052.aldc.att.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3DL572g022614 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 17:05:07 -0400
Received: from [135.70.210.70] (vpn-135-70-210-70.vpn.east.att.com[135.70.210.70]) by maillennium.att.com (mailgw1) with ESMTP id <20120413210205gw1004ore1e> (Authid: tony); Fri, 13 Apr 2012 21:02:05 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [135.70.210.70]
Message-ID: <4F889502.9040505@att.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 17:05:06 -0400
From: Tony Hansen <tony@att.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "apps-discuss@ietf.org Discuss" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
References: <D73B8F43-AC66-48B9-BE26-A38A97C628B4@tzi.org> <f5bmx6ftxm2.fsf@calexico.inf.ed.ac.uk> <4F88546D.5020007@gmx.de> <f5behrrtwqc.fsf@calexico.inf.ed.ac.uk> <4F885889.5020401@gmx.de> <f5baa2ftvfy.fsf@calexico.inf.ed.ac.uk> <4F886487.3050806@gmx.de> <f5b62d3tsg2.fsf@calexico.inf.ed.ac.uk> <4F886D9B.9030203@gmx.de> <4F886F67.5090005@gmx.de> <20120413200214.GE696@jay.w3.org> <4F88899D.3090405@gmx.de> <f5bbomvs7fz.fsf@calexico.inf.ed.ac.uk> <4F888D02.7050802@gmx.de> <4124299A-80EA-4245-AB98-5A9D0BED0F71@sensinode.com>
In-Reply-To: <4124299A-80EA-4245-AB98-5A9D0BED0F71@sensinode.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-RSA-Inspected: yes
X-RSA-Classifications: public
X-RSA-Action: allow
X-Spam: [F=0.2000000000; CM=0.500; S=0.200(2010122901)]
X-MAIL-FROM: <tony@att.com>
X-SOURCE-IP: [144.160.20.145]
X-AnalysisOut: [v=1.0 c=1 a=GmzIfwDQVSsA:10 a=vnNYxAp2wzwA:10 a=BlG6E5tz_8]
X-AnalysisOut: [UA:10 a=ofMgfj31e3cA:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:1]
X-AnalysisOut: [0 a=ZRNLZ4dFUbCvG8UMqPvVAA==:17 a=qkMQBcKtRQsZOMvYrVIA:9 a]
X-AnalysisOut: [=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10]
Cc: "draft-ietf-appsawg-media-type-regs@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-appsawg-media-type-regs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-shelby-exi-registration-01.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 21:06:48 -0000

On 4/13/2012 4:38 PM, Zach Shelby wrote:
> Exactly. So now we are back to registering something like application/senml-exi (in addition to senml+xml and senml+json) where the schema information is included in the media type registration and no content-encoding is used. This would work for the applications I know of right now (SEP2 and SenML). Do we need to write up some kind of information guideline draft for including this kind of information in the media registration when OOB info needs to be defined (not just for EXI, but in general)?

I'm thinking that a statement along these lines needs to go into 
draft-ietf-appsawg-media-type-regs (whose WGLC ends today) -- in other 
words, beef up the section on +suffix registration with text that helps 
people better understand when a +suffix should be used, and when it 
should *not* be used.

I'll work with Ned on that.

     Tony

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email