Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ohye-canonical-link-relation-00.txt

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Fri, 01 July 2011 15:49 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA97A11E80E0 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 08:49:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.800, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jIZNSYlZ8MBn for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 08:49:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id CAE3111E80EC for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 08:49:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 01 Jul 2011 15:49:50 -0000
Received: from mail.greenbytes.de (EHLO [192.168.1.140]) [217.91.35.233] by mail.gmx.net (mp025) with SMTP; 01 Jul 2011 17:49:50 +0200
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/Gla8jlXvGmSgZceys2tghPsRNZiErTOdntfCcW/ QtCx5E+ZJFjALy
Message-ID: <4E0DEC9C.3050004@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 17:49:48 +0200
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>
References: <4E083D3F.6030200@gmx.de> <4E0D3EA5.7010803@gmail.com> <4E0DCFEF.20206@gmx.de> <4E0DEA77.3050007@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E0DEA77.3050007@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>, "link-relations@ietf.org" <link-relations@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ohye-canonical-link-relation-00.txt
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 15:49:52 -0000

On 2011-07-01 17:40, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote:
> ...
>> I believe we'll need this section, and the contents is fine; after
>> all, this is what you have to think of with respect to I18N, no?
> RFC 5988 allows target and context URIs to be IRIs. Current draft has no
> provisions regarding this. However, the actual and current text matches
> encoding considerations better.
> ...

Actually, there's nothing special about the I18N for this link relation; 
so I believe the text should just state that there's nothing to say in 
addition to RFC 5988, Section 8.

Best regards, Julian