Re: [apps-discuss] Request for review: draft-arkko-ipv6-only-experience-04

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Thu, 01 December 2011 23:22 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 146CC21F92E8; Thu, 1 Dec 2011 15:22:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.56
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.56 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.039, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Fze7UA7Y0Ba3; Thu, 1 Dec 2011 15:22:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C636621F92E7; Thu, 1 Dec 2011 15:22:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20E4F2CC43; Fri, 2 Dec 2011 01:22:22 +0200 (EET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xppksczxT0A1; Fri, 2 Dec 2011 01:22:21 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6750C2CC31; Fri, 2 Dec 2011 01:22:21 +0200 (EET)
Message-ID: <4ED80C2D.5080303@piuha.net>
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 01:22:21 +0200
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111110 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20111201071345.08e30588@elandnews.com> <3373.1322780823.024361@puncture>
In-Reply-To: <3373.1322780823.024361@puncture>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: draft-arkko-ipv6-only-experience.all@tools.ietf.org, General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Request for review: draft-arkko-ipv6-only-experience-04
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 23:22:25 -0000

Dave,

> On Thu Dec  1 15:21:34 2011, SM wrote:
>> Could you review draft-arkko-ipv6-only-experience-04 before December 15?  Please post your review to apps-discuss (see below), and DO NOT post it to apps-review.
>
> This is a great document. I will certainly read it again, and I may update my review as a result.
>
> I haven't particularly been looking for editorial issues; none stood out.

Thanks for your comments!

>
> I noticed that whilst some detail was provided well, other details were missing (which XMPP clients were used, for instance - I'm reasonably sure that while many support IPv6, some do not).

We should add this information.

>
> The choice of games seems odd as well - while Rome: Total War remains a popular RTS for a number of reasons, it's also very old. Crysis is comparitively old, too, as is Battelfield (now up to its second sequel).

I'll pass along your note to my kids :-)

> It'd be interesting to see whether more modern games actually support IPv6, in particular for LAN play, given that Win7 typically acquires LAN IPv6 addresses.  I'll see if I can find out a little more information here.

Yes, indeed, and WoW in particular we hear now has the support. But I have not tested it (my kids don't have it...) If someone else could report on that it would be great.

>
> Overall, though, this could be published as-is, and would be a valuable addition to the Informational corpus.
>
> Dave.

Thanks again.

Jari